» Articles » PMID: 16723163

Factors That Influence Improvement for Patients with Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2006 May 26
PMID 16723163
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Assess reasons for improved control for patients with initially poorly controlled diabetes.

Research Design And Methods: Patients in seven practices with type 2 diabetes were selected if within a 6-month period they had two glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels of at least 8.0%. Patient factors that may influence control were compared for patients grouped according to their last two HbA1c levels.

Results: Review of 643 medical records of diabetic patients treated by 29 clinicians identified 69 study patients. After at least 1 year of follow-up 26 patients became well controlled, 14 had intermediate control, and 29 remained in poor control. Becoming controlled was not significantly associated with gender, age, duration of diabetes, BMI, or HbA1c levels prior to baseline. It was inversely associated with greater use of medications (P = 0.04), and positively associated with understanding of diabetes (P = 0.03), adherence to recommendations for meal plan (P = 0.001), and glucose monitoring (P = 0.02). Thirty-one percent of patients who became controlled had a change in life circumstances. Reasons for not advancing medications were probably justified for 69% of patients who remained uncontrolled.

Conclusion: Improved control depends largely on patient self-care behaviors.

Citing Articles

Renoprotective Potency of Sitagliptin versus Pioglitazone in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: Impact on LncMIAT.

Kandeil M, Shaarawy M, Mourad H, Mahmoud M ACS Omega. 2023; 8(45):43218-43226.

PMID: 38024775 PMC: 10652733. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.3c07008.


Diabetes knowledge predicts HbA1c levels of people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in rural China: a ten-month follow-up study.

Wang X, Tian B, Zhang S, Zhang J, Yang W, Li J Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):18248.

PMID: 37880376 PMC: 10600128. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-45312-y.


Effect of a Comprehensive Telehealth Intervention vs Telemonitoring and Care Coordination in Patients With Persistently Poor Type 2 Diabetes Control: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Crowley M, Tarkington P, Bosworth H, Jeffreys A, Coffman C, Maciejewski M JAMA Intern Med. 2022; 182(9):943-952.

PMID: 35877092 PMC: 9315987. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.2947.


Effect of educational interventions on knowledge of the disease and glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Shiferaw W, Akalu T, Desta M, Kassie A, Petrucka P, Aynalem Y BMJ Open. 2021; 11(12):e049806.

PMID: 34887271 PMC: 8663073. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049806.


Food insecurity and glycemic control in individuals with diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes in the United States.

Walker R, Garacci E, Ozieh M, Egede L Prim Care Diabetes. 2021; 15(5):813-818.

PMID: 34006474 PMC: 8458221. DOI: 10.1016/j.pcd.2021.05.003.