» Articles » PMID: 33625363

A Novel User Utility Score for Diabetes Management Using Tailored Mobile Coaching: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Date 2021 Feb 24
PMID 33625363
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Mobile health applications have been developed to support diabetes self-management, but their effectiveness could depend on patient engagement. Therefore, patient engagement must be examined through multifactorial tailored behavioral interventions from an individual perspective.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the usefulness of a novel user utility score (UUS) as a tool to measure patient engagement by using a mobile health application for diabetes management.

Methods: We conducted a subanalysis of results from a 12-month randomized controlled trial of a tailored mobile coaching (TMC) system among insurance policyholders with type 2 diabetes. UUS was calculated as the sum of the scores for 4 major core components (range 0-8): frequency of self-monitoring blood glucose testing, dietary and exercise records, and message reading rate. We explored the association between UUS for the first 3 months and glycemic control over 12 months. In addition, we investigated the relationship of UUS with blood pressure, lipid profile, and self-report scales assessing diabetes self-management.

Results: We divided 72 participants into 2 groups based on UUS for the first 3 months: UUS:0-4 (n=38) and UUS:5-8 (n=34). There was a significant between-group difference in glycated hemoglobin test (HbA) levels for the 12-months study period (P=.011). The HbA decrement at 12 months in the UUS:5-8 group was greater than that of the UUS:0-4 group [-0.92 (SD 1.24%) vs -0.33 (SD 0.80%); P=.049]. After adjusting for confounding factors, UUS was significantly associated with changes in HbA at 3, 6, and 12 months; the regression coefficients were -0.113 (SD 0.040; P=.006), -0.143 (SD 0.045; P=.002), and -0.136 (SD 0.052; P=.011), respectively. Change differences in other health outcomes between the 2 groups were not observed throughout a 12-month follow-up.

Conclusions: UUS as a measure of patient engagement was associated with changes in HbA over the study period of the TMC system and could be used to predict improved glycemic control in diabetes self-management through mobile health interventions.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrial.gov NCT03033407; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03033407.

Citing Articles

Effect of Multimodal App-Based Interventions on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Bodner E, Roth L, Wiencke K, Bischoff C, Schwarz P J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e54324.

PMID: 39854703 PMC: 11806272. DOI: 10.2196/54324.


5. Facilitating Positive Health Behaviors and Well-being to Improve Health Outcomes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.

Diabetes Care. 2024; 48(Supplement_1):S86-S127.

PMID: 39651983 PMC: 11635047. DOI: 10.2337/dc25-S005.


User Engagement With mHealth Interventions to Promote Treatment Adherence and Self-Management in People With Chronic Health Conditions: Systematic Review.

Eaton C, Vallejo N, McDonald X, Wu J, Rodriguez R, Muthusamy N J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e50508.

PMID: 39316431 PMC: 11462107. DOI: 10.2196/50508.


5. Facilitating Positive Health Behaviors and Well-being to Improve Health Outcomes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024.

Diabetes Care. 2023; 47(Suppl 1):S77-S110.

PMID: 38078584 PMC: 10725816. DOI: 10.2337/dc24-S005.


1. Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024.

Diabetes Care. 2023; 47(Suppl 1):S11-S19.

PMID: 38078573 PMC: 10725798. DOI: 10.2337/dc24-S001.


References
1.
Lee E, Lee Y, Lee K, Nam M, Kim Y, Han S . A Korean version of the Appraisal of Diabetes Scale (ADS-K): psychometric evaluation with a population of Koreans with type 2 diabetes. J Transcult Nurs. 2014; 26(3):270-8. DOI: 10.1177/1043659614524793. View

2.
Porter J, Huggins C, Truby H, Collins J . The Effect of Using Mobile Technology-Based Methods That Record Food or Nutrient Intake on Diabetes Control and Nutrition Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Nutrients. 2016; 8(12). PMC: 5188470. DOI: 10.3390/nu8120815. View

3.
Wiederhold B, Riva G, Graffigna G . Ensuring the best care for our increasing aging population: health engagement and positive technology can help patients achieve a more active role in future healthcare. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013; 16(6):411-2. DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2013.1520. View

4.
Graffigna G, Barello S, Libreri C, Bosio C . How to engage type-2 diabetic patients in their own health management: implications for clinical practice. BMC Public Health. 2014; 14:648. PMC: 4083034. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-648. View

5.
Chen L, Pei J, Kuang J, Chen H, Chen Z, Li Z . Effect of lifestyle intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Metabolism. 2014; 64(2):338-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2014.10.018. View