» Articles » PMID: 16668812

Estimation of Mesophyll Conductance to CO(2) Flux by Three Different Methods

Overview
Journal Plant Physiol
Specialty Physiology
Date 1992 Apr 1
PMID 16668812
Citations 82
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The resistance to diffusion of CO(2) from the intercellular airspaces within the leaf through the mesophyll to the sites of carboxylation during photosynthesis was measured using three different techniques. The three techniques include a method based on discrimination against the heavy stable isotope of carbon, (13)C, and two modeling methods. The methods rely upon different assumptions, but the estimates of mesophyll conductance were similar with all three methods. The mesophyll conductance of leaves from a number of species was about 1.4 times the stomatal conductance for CO(2) diffusion determined in unstressed plants at high light. The relatively low CO(2) partial pressure inside chloroplasts of plants with a low mesophyll conductance did not lead to enhanced O(2) sensitivity of photosynthesis because the low conductance caused a significant drop in the chloroplast CO(2) partial pressure upon switching to low O(2). We found no correlation between mesophyll conductance and the ratio of internal leaf area to leaf surface area and only a weak correlation between mesophyll conductance and the proportion of leaf volume occupied by air. Mesophyll conductance was independent of CO(2) and O(2) partial pressure during the measurement, indicating that a true physical parameter, independent of biochemical effects, was being measured. No evidence for CO(2)-accumulating mechanisms was found. Some plants, notably Citrus aurantium and Simmondsia chinensis, had very low conductances that limit the rate of photosynthesis these plants can attain at atmospheric CO(2) level.

Citing Articles

Leaf phenology determines the response of poplar genotypes to O through mesophyll conductance.

Hoshika Y, Paoletti E, Pisuttu C, Cotrozzi L, Haworth M, Pellegrini E Plant J. 2025; 121(5):e70091.

PMID: 40052505 PMC: 11887005. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.70091.


Evaluating the contribution of plant metabolic pathways in the light to the ATP:NADPH demand using a meta-analysis of isotopically non-stationary metabolic flux analyses.

Smith K, Strand D, Walker B Photosynth Res. 2024; 161(3):177-189.

PMID: 38874662 PMC: 11324800. DOI: 10.1007/s11120-024-01106-5.


Using Carbon Stable Isotopes to Study C and C Photosynthesis: Models and Calculations.

Ubierna N, Holloway-Phillips M, Wingate L, Ogee J, Busch F, Farquhar G Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2790:163-211.

PMID: 38649572 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3790-6_10.


Tools for Measuring Photosynthesis at Different Scales.

Walker B, Driever S, Kromdijk J, Lawson T, Busch F Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2790:1-26.

PMID: 38649563 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3790-6_1.


Plant Physiological Analysis to Overcome Limitations to Plant Phenotyping.

Haworth M, Marino G, Atzori G, Fabbri A, Daccache A, Killi D Plants (Basel). 2023; 12(23).

PMID: 38068650 PMC: 10708318. DOI: 10.3390/plants12234015.


References
1.
Bongi G, Loreto F . Gas-Exchange Properties of Salt-Stressed Olive (Olea europea L.) Leaves. Plant Physiol. 1989; 90(4):1408-16. PMC: 1061904. DOI: 10.1104/pp.90.4.1408. View

2.
Parkhurst D, Mott K . Intercellular Diffusion Limits to CO(2) Uptake in Leaves : Studies in Air and Helox. Plant Physiol. 1990; 94(3):1024-32. PMC: 1077337. DOI: 10.1104/pp.94.3.1024. View

3.
Idso S, Kimball B . Downward Regulation of Photosynthesis and Growth at High CO(2) Levels : No Evidence for Either Phenomenon in Three-Year Study of Sour Orange Trees. Plant Physiol. 1991; 96(3):990-2. PMC: 1080876. DOI: 10.1104/pp.96.3.990. View

4.
Harley P, Loreto F, Di Marco G, Sharkey T . Theoretical Considerations when Estimating the Mesophyll Conductance to CO(2) Flux by Analysis of the Response of Photosynthesis to CO(2). Plant Physiol. 1992; 98(4):1429-36. PMC: 1080368. DOI: 10.1104/pp.98.4.1429. View