» Articles » PMID: 16668583

Lidocaine and ATPase Inhibitor Interaction with the Chloroplast Envelope

Overview
Journal Plant Physiol
Specialty Physiology
Date 1991 Dec 1
PMID 16668583
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Photosynthetic capacity of isolated intact chloroplasts is known to be sensitive to K(+) fluxes across the chloroplast envelope. However, little is known about the system of chloroplast envelope proteins that regulate this K(+) movement. The research described in this report focused on characterizing some of the components of this transport system by examining inhibitor effects on chloroplast metabolism. Digitoxin, an inhibitor of membrane-bound Na(+)/K(+) ATPases, was found to reduce stromal K(+) at a range of external K(+) and inhibit photosynthesis. Scatchard plot analysis revealed a specific protein receptor site with a K(m) for digitoxin binding of 13 nanomolar. Studies suggested that the receptor site was on the interior of the envelope. The effect of a class of amine anesthetics that are known to be K(+) channel blockers on chloroplast metabolism was also studied. Under conditions that facilitate low stromal pH and concomitant photosynthetic inhibition, the anesthetic, lidocaine, was found to stimulate photosynthesis. This stimulation was associated with the maintenance of higher stromal K(+). Comparison of the effects on photosynthesis of lidocaine analogs which varied in lipophilicity suggested a lipophilic pathway for anesthetic action. The results of experiments with lidocaine and digitoxin were consistent with the hypothesis that a K(+) channel and a K(+)-pumping envelope ATPase contribute to overall K(+) flux across the chloroplast envelope. Under appropriate assay conditions, photosynthetic capacity of isolated chloroplasts was shown to be much affected by the activity of these putative envelope proteins.

Citing Articles

Diethyl ether anesthesia induces transient cytosolic [Ca] increase, heat shock proteins, and heat stress tolerance of photosystem II in .

Pavlovic A, Jaksova J, Kucerova Z, Spundova M, Rac M, Roudnicky P Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13:995001.

PMID: 36172556 PMC: 9511054. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.995001.


Stress response of transgenic tobacco plants expressing a cyanobacterial ferredoxin in chloroplasts.

Ceccoli R, Blanco N, Medina M, Carrillo N Plant Mol Biol. 2011; 76(6):535-44.

PMID: 21584860 DOI: 10.1007/s11103-011-9786-9.


K stimulation of ATPase activity associated with the chloroplast inner envelope.

Wu W, Berkowitz G Plant Physiol. 1992; 99(2):553-60.

PMID: 16668922 PMC: 1080499. DOI: 10.1104/pp.99.2.553.


Chloroplast Inner-Envelope ATPase Acts as a Primary H+ Pump.

Berkowitz G, Peters J Plant Physiol. 1993; 102(1):261-267.

PMID: 12231817 PMC: 158771. DOI: 10.1104/pp.102.1.261.


Stimulation by Light of Rapid pH Regulation in the Chloroplast Stroma in Vivo as Indicated by CO2 Solubilization in Leaves.

Hauser M, Eichelmann H, Oja V, Heber U, Laisk A Plant Physiol. 1995; 108(3):1059-1066.

PMID: 12228527 PMC: 157457. DOI: 10.1104/pp.108.3.1059.


References
1.
Lebel D, Poirier G, BEAUDOIN A . A convenient method for the ATPase assay. Anal Biochem. 1978; 85(1):86-9. DOI: 10.1016/0003-2697(78)90277-4. View

2.
Peters J, Berkowitz G . Studies on the System Regulating Proton Movement across the Chloroplast Envelope : Effects of ATPase Inhibitors, Mg, and an Amine Anesthetic on Stromal pH and Photosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 1991; 95(4):1229-36. PMC: 1077677. DOI: 10.1104/pp.95.4.1229. View

3.
Linnett P, Beechey R . Inhibitors of the ATP synthethase system. Methods Enzymol. 1979; 55:472-518. DOI: 10.1016/0076-6879(79)55061-7. View

4.
Huber S, Maury W . Effects of Magnesium on Intact Chloroplasts: I. EVIDENCE FOR ACTIVATION OF (SODIUM) POTASSIUM/PROTON EXCHANGE ACROSS THE CHLOROPLAST ENVELOPE. Plant Physiol. 1980; 65(2):350-4. PMC: 440325. DOI: 10.1104/pp.65.2.350. View

5.
Heldt W, Werdan K, Milovancev M, Geller G . Alkalization of the chloroplast stroma caused by light-dependent proton flux into the thylakoid space. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1973; 314(2):224-41. DOI: 10.1016/0005-2728(73)90137-0. View