» Articles » PMID: 16638857

Immunohistochemical and Genetic Evaluation of Deoxycytidine Kinase in Pancreatic Cancer: Relationship to Molecular Mechanisms of Gemcitabine Resistance and Survival

Overview
Journal Clin Cancer Res
Specialty Oncology
Date 2006 Apr 28
PMID 16638857
Citations 69
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Gemcitabine is considered the standard first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. More recent strategies have focused on improving the efficacy of gemcitabine by either improving the method of delivery or by combining gemcitabine with other non-cross-resistant chemotherapy agents or with small-molecule drugs. However, the clinical benefits, response rates, and duration of responses have been modest. Deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) is the rate-limiting enzyme involved in the metabolism of gemcitabine. The expression of dCK has been postulated to be correlative of gemcitabine resistance. We determined the relationship of dCK immunohistochemical protein expression and/or genetic status of dCK in a panel of human pancreatic cancer tissues and pancreatic cancer cell lines and determined the relationship of these variables to the clinical outcome of patients treated with gemcitabine. We report that dCK protein expression is expressed in the majority of pancreatic cancers analyzed (40 of 44 cases, 91%) and showed a range of labeling intensities ranging from 1+ (labeling weaker in intensity than normal lymphocytes present in same section) to 3+ (labeling greater in intensity than normal lymphocytes present in same section). When labeling intensity was compared with survival, low dCK expression (1+ labeling) was correlated with both overall survival (P < 0.009) and progression-free survival following gemcitabine treatment (P < 0.04). Low dCK labeling intensity was also significantly correlated with patient age (70.3 +/- 8.1 versus 59.8 +/- 7.4 years; P < 0.0006), suggesting that age-related methylation of the dCK gene may account in part for the observed differences. Sequencing of the entire dCK coding sequence in 17 cell lines and 9 patients' cancer tissues with disease progression while on gemcitabine did not identify any mutations, suggesting that genetic alterations of dCK are not a common mechanism of resistance to gemcitabine for this tumor type. Moreover, dCK labeling showed similar patterns and intensities of labeling among matched pretreatment and post-treatment tissues. In summary, pretreatment levels of dCK protein are most correlated with overall survival following gemcitabine treatment and are stable even after resistance to gemcitabine is clinically documented.

Citing Articles

Design Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer Contrast Agents and Nanocarriers for Imaging Proton Exchange .

Su H, Chan K ACS Nano. 2024; 18(50):33775-33791.

PMID: 39642940 PMC: 11656841. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.4c05923.


Butterfly Effect in Cytarabine: Combined NMR-NQR Experiment, Solid-State Computational Modeling, Quantitative Structure-Property Relationships and Molecular Docking Study.

Latosinska J, Latosinska M, Seliger J, Zagar V, Apih T Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024; 17(4).

PMID: 38675407 PMC: 11053780. DOI: 10.3390/ph17040445.


Deoxycytidine kinase inactivation enhances gemcitabine resistance and sensitizes mitochondrial metabolism interference in pancreatic cancer.

Dash S, Ueda T, Komuro A, Honda M, Sugisawa R, Okada H Cell Death Dis. 2024; 15(2):131.

PMID: 38346958 PMC: 10861559. DOI: 10.1038/s41419-024-06531-x.


Targeting AHR Increases Pancreatic Cancer Cell Sensitivity to Gemcitabine through the ELAVL1-DCK Pathway.

Stukas D, Jasukaitiene A, Bartkeviciene A, Matthews J, Maimets T, Teino I Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(17).

PMID: 37685961 PMC: 10487468. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241713155.


Resistance to Gemcitabine in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Physiopathologic and Pharmacologic Review.

Koltai T, Reshkin S, Carvalho T, Di Molfetta D, Greco M, Alfarouk K Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(10).

PMID: 35626089 PMC: 9139729. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102486.


References
1.
Van Moorsel C, Veerman G, Ruiz van Haperen V, Bergman A, Jensen P, Sehested M . Differential effects of gemcitabine on nucleotide pools of 19 solid tumor cell lines. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1998; 431:661-5. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-5381-6_128. View

2.
Neff T, Blau C . Forced expression of cytidine deaminase confers resistance to cytosine arabinoside and gemcitabine. Exp Hematol. 1996; 24(11):1340-6. View

3.
El-Rayes B, Philip P . A review of systemic therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2005; 1(7):430-4. View

4.
Chakravarthy A, Abrams R, Yeo C, Korman L, Donehower R, Hruban R . Intensified adjuvant combined modality therapy for resected periampullary adenocarcinoma: acceptable toxicity and suggestion of improved 1-year disease-free survival. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000; 48(4):1089-96. DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00755-0. View

5.
Obata T, Endo Y, Tanaka M, Uchida H, Matsuda A, Sasaki T . Deletion mutants of human deoxycytidine kinase mRNA in cells resistant to antitumor cytosine nucleosides. Jpn J Cancer Res. 2001; 92(7):793-8. PMC: 5926779. DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2001.tb01163.x. View