» Articles » PMID: 16633002

Safety, Feasibility, and Short-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Ileal-pouch-anal Anastomosis: a Single Institutional Case-matched Experience

Overview
Journal Ann Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2006 Apr 25
PMID 16633002
Citations 63
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare safety and short-term outcomes of 100 laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) versus 200 conventional open IPAA patients.

Summary Background Data: Outcomes of laparoscopic IPAA (LAP-IPAA) have been incompletely characterized. Previous reports are characterized by small numbers of patients and rarely include case-matched or randomized trial methodology. This report describes 100 LAP-IPAA patients case matched to 200 open IPAA patients.

Methods: Between 1998 and 2004, 100 consecutive LAP-IPAA patients (75 laparoscopic assisted, 25 hand assisted) were identified and case matched to 200 open IPAA control patients by age, operation, gender, date of operation, and body mass index. Operative and postoperative outcomes at 90 days were compared.

Results: A total of 300 patients (180 female) with a median age of 32 years (range, 17-66 years), and a median body mass index of 23 kg/m (range, 16-34 kg/m) underwent IPAA (100 LAP-IPAA, 200 open IPAA). Diagnosis (chronic ulcerative colitis 97%, familial adenomatous polyposis 3%) and previous operative history were equivalent between groups. One intraoperative complication occurred in each group. Overall, the laparoscopic conversion rate was 6%. Median operative time was longer for the LAP-IPAA group (333 minutes versus 230 minutes, P < 0.0001). LAP-IPAA patients had shorter median time to regular diet (3 versus 5 days), time to ileostomy output (2 versus 3 days), length of stay (4 versus 7 days), and decreased IV narcotic use (all P < 0.05. Postoperative morbidity was equivalent (LAP-IPAA = 33%, open IPAA = 37%), mortality was nil, and readmission rates were equal (LAP-IPAA = 21%, open IPAA = 22%). Reoperation was required in 3% of LAP-IPAA and 6.5% of open IPAA patients (P < 0.2) during the first 3 months.

Conclusion: LAP-IPAA is equivalent to open IPAA in terms of safety and feasibility. In addition, LAP-IPAA provides significant improvements in short-term recovery outcomes.

Citing Articles

Pouch outcomes after minimally invasive vs. open proctectomy during IPAA reconstruction.

Metzger D, Mesiti A, Johnson J, Li Y, Brouwer J, Manasa M Surg Endosc. 2025; .

PMID: 39979620 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-025-11574-y.


Laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis reduces the risk of surgical site infections: An ACS-NSQIP study.

Herman K, Nemeth S, Shen B, Church J, Kiran R Surg Pract Sci. 2025; 10():100114.

PMID: 39845604 PMC: 11749986. DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2022.100114.


A Path to High-Value Gastric Cancer Surgery Care Delivery.

Teh S, Shiraga S, Kellem A, Li R, Le D, Arsalane S Ann Surg Open. 2024; 5(2):e408.

PMID: 38911627 PMC: 11192013. DOI: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000408.


The Impacts of Laparoscopic Restorative Proctocolectomy for Ulcerative Colitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Uchino M, Ikeuchi H, Horio Y, Kuwahara R, Kusunoki K, Nagano K Inflamm Intest Dis. 2024; 9(1):62-70.

PMID: 38544522 PMC: 10972575. DOI: 10.1159/000535832.


Restorative pouch surgery following proctocolectomy for inflammatory bowel disease: past experience and future direction.

Cohen D, Silvestri C, Schwartzberg D Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023; 8:27.

PMID: 37601738 PMC: 10432232. DOI: 10.21037/tgh-23-28.


References
1.
Hildebrandt U, Lindemann W, Kreissler-Haag D, FEIFEL G, Ecker K . [Laparoscopically-assisted proctocolectomy with ileoanal pouch in ulcerative colitis]. Zentralbl Chir. 1998; 123(4):403-5. View

2.
Dunker M, Bemelman W, Slors J, van Duijvendijk P, Gouma D . Functional outcome, quality of life, body image, and cosmesis in patients after laparoscopic-assisted and conventional restorative proctocolectomy: a comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001; 44(12):1800-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF02234458. View

3.
Sugerman H, Sugerman E, Meador J, Newsome Jr H, Kellum Jr J, DeMaria E . Ileal pouch anal anastomosis without ileal diversion. Ann Surg. 2000; 232(4):530-41. PMC: 1421185. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200010000-00008. View

4.
Reilly W, Pemberton J, Wolff B, Nivatvongs S, Devine R, Litchy W . Randomized prospective trial comparing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by excising the anal mucosa to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by preserving the anal mucosa. Ann Surg. 1997; 225(6):666-76; discussion 676-7. PMC: 1190866. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199706000-00004. View

5.
Chen H, Wexner S, Iroatulam A, Pikarsky A, Alabaz O, Nogueras J . Laparoscopic colectomy compares favorably with colectomy by laparotomy for reduction of postoperative ileus. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000; 43(1):61-5. DOI: 10.1007/BF02237245. View