» Articles » PMID: 11353959

Advantages of Laparoscopic Resection for Ileocolic Crohn's Disease. Improved Outcomes and Reduced Costs

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2001 May 17
PMID 11353959
Citations 52
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic colorectal procedures are considered to be technically challenging, and there is a lack of consensus regarding the magnitude of their benefits. The laparoscopic approach is generally held to be more expensive. Using a model of a single procedure performed for a single indication (ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease [CD]), we set out to demonstrate the feasibility of this procedure by determining the conversion rate, documenting the patient benefits, and performing a formal cost analysis.

Methods: Consecutive cases of laparoscopic ileocolic resection for CD were identified (LAP). Case-match methodology identified a series of open laparotomy controls (OPEN) that were matched for five potential confounding criteria: age, gender, diagnosis, type of resection, and date of operation. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative details were gathered. Medical resource utilization was tracked using a standardized database, and all costs were reported in 1999 dollars.

Results: The conversion rate was 5.9%. Resolution of ileus occurred more rapidly in the LAP than in the OPEN group. The time to clears in the LAP group was a median of 0 days (range, 0-4) vs 3.0 days (range, 2-8) in the OPEN group (p = 0.0001). Time to regular diet was 2.0 days (range, 1-6) in the LAP group vs 5.0 days (range, 3-12) in the OPEN group (p = 0.0001). Length of hospital stay was significantly reduced in the LAP group (4.0 days [range, 2-8], vs 7.0 days [range, 3-14], p = 0.0001). The LAP group had significantly lower direct costs ($8684 vs $11,373) and indirect costs ($1358 vs $2349) than the OPEN group (p < 0.001). This resulted in total costs of $9895 for LAP vs $13,268 for OPEN (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Laparoscopic ileocolic resection for CD is feasible. There are significant postoperative benefits in terms of resolution of ileus, narcotic use, and hospital stay. This approach translates into cost savings of >$3300 for laparoscopic patients.

Citing Articles

Surgical Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Anto V, Dawes A, Vrees M, Watson A, Lightner A R I Med J (2013). 2022; 105(10):25-30.

PMID: 36413448 PMC: 11554358.


Surgical Strategies to Reduce Postoperative Recurrence of Crohn's Disease After Ileocolic Resection.

Reynolds I, Doogan K, Ryan E, Hechtl D, Lecot F, Arya S Front Surg. 2022; 8:804137.

PMID: 34977147 PMC: 8718441. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.804137.


The role of laparoscopic surgery in repeat ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease.

Carmichael H, Peyser D, Baratta V, Bhasin D, Dean A, Khaitov S Colorectal Dis. 2021; 23(8):2075-2084.

PMID: 33851498 PMC: 10176488. DOI: 10.1111/codi.15675.


Laparoscopy for Benign Diseases of the Colon.

Smith R, Maron D Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2017; 30(2):91-98.

PMID: 28381939 PMC: 5380460. DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1597318.


Single-Port Surgery in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Review of Current Evidence.

de Groof E, Buskens C, Bemelman W World J Surg. 2016; 40(9):2276-82.

PMID: 27094562 PMC: 4982875. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3509-y.


References
1.
Liu C, Rolandelli R, Ashley S, Evans B, Shin M, McFadden D . Laparoscopic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease. Am Surg. 1995; 61(12):1054-6. View

2.
Cuschieri A, Ferreira E, Goh P, Idezuki Y, Maddern G, Marks G . Guidelines for conducting economic outcomes studies for endoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc. 1997; 11(3):308-14. DOI: 10.1007/s004649900352. View

3.
Briggs A, Gray A . The distribution of health care costs and their statistical analysis for economic evaluation. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1998; 3(4):233-45. DOI: 10.1177/135581969800300410. View

4.
LUDWIG K, Milsom J, Church J, Fazio V . Preliminary experience with laparoscopic intestinal surgery for Crohn's disease. Am J Surg. 1996; 171(1):52-5; discussion 55-6. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80073-7. View

5.
Briggs A, Wonderling D, Mooney C . Pulling cost-effectiveness analysis up by its bootstraps: a non-parametric approach to confidence interval estimation. Health Econ. 1997; 6(4):327-40. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199707)6:4<327::aid-hec282>3.0.co;2-w. View