» Articles » PMID: 16632509

Dynamic Protein Domains: Identification, Interdependence, and Stability

Overview
Journal Biophys J
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2006 Apr 25
PMID 16632509
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Existing methods of domain identification in proteins usually provide no information about the degree of domain independence and stability. However, this information is vital for many areas of protein research. The recently developed hierarchical clustering of correlation patterns (HCCP) technique provides machine-based domain identification in a computationally simple and physically consistent way. Here we present the modification of this technique, which not only allows determination of the most plausible number of dynamic domains but also makes it possible to estimate the degree of their independence (the extent of correlated motion) and stability (the range of environmental conditions, where domains remain intact). With this technique we provided domain assignments and calculated intra- and interdomain correlations and interdomain energies for >2500 test proteins. It is shown that mean intradomain correlation of motions can serve as a quantitative criterion of domain independence, and the HCCP stability gap is a measure of their stability. Our data show that the motions of domains with high stability are usually independent. In contrast, the domains with moderate stability usually exhibit a substantial degree of correlated motions. It is shown that in multidomain proteins the domains are most stable if they are of similar size, and this correlates with the observed abundance of such proteins.

Citing Articles

Osmolyte-Like Stabilizing Effects of Low GdnHCl Concentrations on d-Glucose/d-Galactose-Binding Protein.

Fonin A, Golikova A, Zvereva I, DAuria S, Staiano M, Uversky V Int J Mol Sci. 2017; 18(9).

PMID: 28925982 PMC: 5618657. DOI: 10.3390/ijms18092008.


Molecular mechanisms in the activation of abscisic acid receptor PYR1.

Dorosh L, Kharenko O, Rajagopalan N, Loewen M, Stepanova M PLoS Comput Biol. 2013; 9(6):e1003114.

PMID: 23825939 PMC: 3694813. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003114.


Stability of domain structures in multi-domain proteins.

Bhaskara R, Srinivasan N Sci Rep. 2012; 1:40.

PMID: 22355559 PMC: 3216527. DOI: 10.1038/srep00040.


Comparative analysis of essential collective dynamics and NMR-derived flexibility profiles in evolutionarily diverse prion proteins.

Santo K, Berjanskii M, Wishart D, Stepanova M Prion. 2011; 5(3):188-200.

PMID: 21869604 PMC: 3226046. DOI: 10.4161/pri.5.3.16097.


A systematic methodology for defining coarse-grained sites in large biomolecules.

Zhang Z, Lu L, Noid W, Krishna V, Pfaendtner J, Voth G Biophys J. 2008; 95(11):5073-83.

PMID: 18757560 PMC: 2586547. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.108.139626.


References
1.
Keskin O, Durell S, Bahar I, Jernigan R, Covell D . Relating molecular flexibility to function: a case study of tubulin. Biophys J. 2002; 83(2):663-80. PMC: 1302177. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75199-0. View

2.
Schuyler A, Chirikjian G . Efficient determination of low-frequency normal modes of large protein structures by cluster-NMA. J Mol Graph Model. 2005; 24(1):46-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2005.05.002. View

3.
Medved L, Litvinovich S, Privalov P . Domain organization of the terminal parts in the fibrinogen molecule. FEBS Lett. 1986; 202(2):298-302. DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(86)80705-0. View

4.
Fischer K, Marqusee S . A rapid test for identification of autonomous folding units in proteins. J Mol Biol. 2000; 302(3):701-12. DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4049. View

5.
Sato S, Kuhlman B, Wu W, Raleigh D . Folding of the multidomain ribosomal protein L9: the two domains fold independently with remarkably different rates. Biochemistry. 1999; 38(17):5643-50. DOI: 10.1021/bi9830314. View