» Articles » PMID: 16607536

The Efficient Isolation of Murine Splenic Dendritic Cells and Their Cytochemical Features

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2006 Apr 12
PMID 16607536
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite their importance in professional antigen presentation and their ubiquitous presence, dendritic cells (DCs) are usually found in such trace amounts in tissues that their isolation with high purity is a difficult task. Because of their scarcity, accurate determination of the purity of isolated dendritic cells is very important. In this study, we purified murine splenic dendritic cells by a three-step enrichment method and evaluated their morphological, cytochemical and functional characteristics. Purity of the isolated cells was determined by established methods such as flow cytometry (FC) and immunocytochemistry (ICC) using anti-CD11c monoclonal antibody. In order to test purified DC functional properties, we used in vivo antigen presentation assay. Our results showed that antigen-pulsed DCs are potent stimulators of antigen-specific lymphocyte proliferation. We studied myeloperoxidase (MPO) and non-specific esterase (NSE) activity in isolated cells to determine the purity of dendritic cells compared to more conventional methods. Our results showed that murine splenic dendritic cells were deficient in both MPO and NSE activity and the percentage of purity obtained by NSE staining on isolated cells was comparable to the results obtained by either FC or ICC. To our knowledge, this is the first report on using NSE activity for determination of the purity of isolated murine splenic dendritic cells. We, therefore, recommend that NSE activity be employed as a simple, inexpensive and yet accurate method for evaluation of the purity of isolated murine splenic dendritic cells.

Citing Articles

Expression of Human Placenta-specific 1 (PLAC1) in CHO-K1 Cells.

Mahmoudian J, Nazari M, Ghods R, Jeddi-Tehrani M, Ostad S, Ghahremani M Avicenna J Med Biotechnol. 2020; 12(1):24-31.

PMID: 32153735 PMC: 7035464.


Improved Efficacy of a Dendritic Cell-Based Vaccine against a Murine Model of Colon Cancer: The Helper Protein Effect.

Zarnani A, Torabi-Rahvar M, Bozorgmehr M, Zareie M, Mojtabavi N Cancer Res Treat. 2015; 47(3):518-26.

PMID: 25648091 PMC: 4506100. DOI: 10.4143/crt.2013.241.


Identification of dendritic antigen-presenting cells in the zebrafish.

Lugo-Villarino G, Balla K, Stachura D, Banuelos K, Werneck M, Traver D Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(36):15850-5.

PMID: 20733076 PMC: 2936643. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1000494107.


Ontogeny and phagocytic function of baboon lung dendritic cells.

Awasthi S, Wolf R, White G Immunol Cell Biol. 2009; 87(5):419-27.

PMID: 19223853 PMC: 2705687. DOI: 10.1038/icb.2009.2.


Recent progress in histochemistry.

Zuber C, Taatjes D, Roth J Histochem Cell Biol. 2007; 128(6):557-94.

PMID: 17972094 DOI: 10.1007/s00418-007-0350-2.


References
1.
Crowley M, Inaba K, Gezelter S, Steinman R . Use of the fluorescence activated cell sorter to enrich dendritic cells from mouse spleen. J Immunol Methods. 1990; 133(1):55-66. DOI: 10.1016/0022-1759(90)90318-p. View

2.
Ruedl C, RIESER C, Bock G, Wick G, Wolf H . Phenotypic and functional characterization of CD11c+ dendritic cell population in mouse Peyer's patches. Eur J Immunol. 1996; 26(8):1801-6. DOI: 10.1002/eji.1830260821. View

3.
Stoll S, Jonuleit H, Schmitt E, Muller G, Yamauchi H, Kurimoto M . Production of functional IL-18 by different subtypes of murine and human dendritic cells (DC): DC-derived IL-18 enhances IL-12-dependent Th1 development. Eur J Immunol. 1998; 28(10):3231-9. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199810)28:10<3231::AID-IMMU3231>3.0.CO;2-Q. View

4.
Yam L, Li C, CROSBY W . Cytochemical identification of monocytes and granulocytes. Am J Clin Pathol. 1971; 55(3):283-90. DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/55.3.283. View

5.
Crowley M, Inaba K, Steinman R . The cell surface of mouse dendritic cells: FACS analyses of dendritic cells from different tissues including thymus. Cell Immunol. 1989; 118(1):108-25. DOI: 10.1016/0008-8749(89)90361-4. View