» Articles » PMID: 16603564

Bone-patellar Tendon-bone Autografts Versus Hamstring Autografts for Reconstruction of Anterior Cruciate Ligament: Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal BMJ
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2006 Apr 11
PMID 16603564
Citations 101
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To compare bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts with hamstring autografts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Data Sources: Medline, WebSPIRS, Science Citation Index, Current Contents databases, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Review methods All randomised controlled trials reporting one or more outcome related to stability (instrumented measurement of knee laxity, Lachman test, or pivot shift test) and morbidity (anterior knee pain, kneeling test, loss of extension, or graft failure). Study quality was assessed by using a 5 point scale. Random effect models were used to pool the data. Heterogeneity in the effect of treatment was tested on the basis of study quality, randomisation status, and number of tendon strands used.

Results: 24 trials of 18 cohorts (1512 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Study quality was poor for nine studies and fair for nine studies. The weighted mean difference of the instrumented measurement of knee laxity was 0.36 (95% confidence interval 0.01 to 0.71; P = 0.04). Relative risk of a positive Lachman test was 1.22 (1.01 to 1.47; P = 0.04), of anterior knee pain 0.57 (0.44 to 0.74; P < 0.0001), of a positive kneeling test 0.26 (0.14 to 0.48; P < 0.0001), and of loss of extension 0.52 (0.34 to 0.80; P = 0.003). Other results were not significant.

Conclusion: Morbidity was lower for hamstring autografts than for patellar tendon autografts. Evidence that patellar tendon autografts offer better stability was weak. The poor quality of the studies calls into question the robustness of the analyses.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Dynamic Postural Stability in Autografts Versus Allografts Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Remnant Preservation: A Prospective Study With 1-Year Follow-up.

Rhim H, Lee J, Lee S, Kang C, Han S, Jang K Orthop J Sports Med. 2025; 13(1):23259671241303752.

PMID: 39839982 PMC: 11748150. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241303752.


Comparison of Clinical Results Using Hamstring Versus Quadriceps Tendon Graft Versus Bone Patella Tendon in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Fallah E, Naghshbandi M, Ghafoury R, Hosseini Zare N Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2024; 38:79.

PMID: 39678774 PMC: 11644201. DOI: 10.47176/mjiri.38.79.


Modified Bridge-Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair.

Kantrowitz D, Darden C, Haunschild E, Gladstone J, Anthony S Arthrosc Tech. 2024; 13(9):103034.

PMID: 39308585 PMC: 11411291. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2024.103034.


Bridge-Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Restoration: 6-Year Results From the First-in-Human Cohort Study.

Fleming B, Baranker B, Badger G, Kiapour A, Ecklund K, Micheli L Orthop J Sports Med. 2024; 12(8):23259671241260632.

PMID: 39143986 PMC: 11322937. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241260632.


Patellar Tendon Reconstruction Using Tibialis Posterior Allograft for Treatment of Patellar Tendon Rupture After Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Renshaw A, Few W, Desai B, Godshaw B, Jones D Ochsner J. 2024; 24(2):151-156.

PMID: 38912180 PMC: 11192220. DOI: 10.31486/toj.23.0104.


References
1.
Lyman G, Kuderer N . The strengths and limitations of meta-analyses based on aggregate data. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005; 5:14. PMC: 1097735. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-14. View

2.
Shelbourne K, Trumper R . Preventing anterior knee pain after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1997; 25(1):41-7. DOI: 10.1177/036354659702500108. View

3.
Carter T, Edinger S . Isokinetic evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: hamstring versus patellar tendon. Arthroscopy. 1999; 15(2):169-72. DOI: 10.1053/ar.1999.v15.0150161. View

4.
Marx R, Jones E, Angel M, Wickiewicz T, Warren R . Beliefs and attitudes of members of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons regarding the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injury. Arthroscopy. 2003; 19(7):762-70. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-8063(03)00398-0. View

5.
Fithian D, Paxton L, Goltz D . Fate of the anterior cruciate ligament-injured knee. Orthop Clin North Am. 2003; 33(4):621-36, v. DOI: 10.1016/s0030-5898(02)00015-9. View