» Articles » PMID: 16575608

Favourable Mid-term Results of the VerSys CT Polished Cemented Femoral Stem for Total Hip Arthroplasty

Overview
Journal Int Orthop
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2006 Apr 1
PMID 16575608
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We evaluated the mid-term clinical and radiographical performance of a cohort of patients who underwent primary total hip replacement with a modern, forged cobalt-chrome, polished cemented femoral stem with proximal and distal centralisation. Sixty-seven patients with 73 hybrid total hip replacements were followed up clinically and radiographically for an average of 6.1 years (4-8.5). No patient was lost. No hips required revision, and all stems are radiographically well-fixed. Four hips developed localised osteolysis: one at the site of a proximal periprosthetic fracture, another at the level of a lateral femoral window of a previous core decompression, the third at the mid third of the femoral component, and the fourth on the greater trochanter, associated with accelerated polyethylene wear. This modern polished stem yielded excellent, predictable clinical and radiographic results at an intermediate follow-up.

Citing Articles

The Long-Term Efficacy of Computed Tomography-Navigated Total Hip Arthroplasty: An 18-Year Follow-Up Study.

Imai N, Miyasaka D, Ibuchi S, Kimura K, Hirano Y, Horigome Y J Clin Med. 2024; 13(5).

PMID: 38592236 PMC: 10932160. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051374.


Femoral Stem Cementation in Hip Arthroplasty: The Know-How of a "Lost" Art.

Emara A, Ng M, Krebs V, Bloomfield M, Molloy R, Piuzzi N Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2021; 14(1):47-59.

PMID: 33453016 PMC: 7930165. DOI: 10.1007/s12178-020-09681-5.


The effect of a collar and surface finish on cemented femoral stems: a prospective randomised trial of four stem designs.

Hutt J, Hazlerigg A, Aneel A, Epie G, Dabis H, Twyman R Int Orthop. 2014; 38(6):1131-7.

PMID: 24474088 PMC: 4037524. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-2256-z.


The utility and precision of analogue and digital preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty.

Gonzalez Della Valle A, Comba F, Taveras N, Salvati E Int Orthop. 2007; 32(3):289-94.

PMID: 17404731 PMC: 2323429. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-006-0317-2.

References
1.
Grose A, Valle A, Bullough P, Lyman S, Tomek I, Pellicci P . High failure rate of a modern, proximally roughened, cemented stem for total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2006; 30(4):243-7. PMC: 2532124. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-005-0066-7. View

2.
Datir S, Wynn-Jones C . Staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty using rough and smooth surface femoral stems with similar design: 10-year survivorship of 48 cases. Acta Orthop. 2006; 76(6):809-14. DOI: 10.1080/17453670510045417. View

3.
Callaghan J, Albright J, Goetz D, Olejniczak J, Johnston R . Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement. Minimum twenty-five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82(4):487-97. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200004000-00004. View

4.
Wroblewski B, Fleming P, Siney P . Charnley low-frictional torque arthroplasty of the hip. 20-to-30 year results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000; 81(3):427-30. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.81b3.9521. View

5.
Sylvain G, Kassab S, Coutts R, Santore R . Early failure of a roughened surface, precoated femoral component in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001; 16(2):141-8. DOI: 10.1054/arth.2001.20541. View