» Articles » PMID: 16549019

Long Term Effects of Micro-surgical Testicular Sperm Extraction on Androgen Status in Patients with Non Obstructive Azoospermia

Overview
Journal BMC Urol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Urology
Date 2006 Mar 22
PMID 16549019
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The aim of our study was to review the results of microsurgically performed testicular sperm extraction (TESE) and to evaluate its possible long term effects on serum testosterone (T).

Methods: We operated on 48 men (35 +/- 8 years) with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). If no spermatozoa were found following a micro epididymal sperm extraction (Silber et al., 1994) and testicular biopsy, testicular microdissection was performed or multiple microsurgical testicular biopsies were taken. The mean follow-up of the serum T was 2.4 +/- 1.1 years.

Results: Sperm was retrieved in 17/48 (35%) of the men. The per couple take home baby rate if sperm was retrieved was 4/17 (24%). Serum T decreased significantly at follow-up (p < 0.05) and 5/31 (16%) de novo androgen deficiencies developed

Conclusion: In patients with non-obstructive azoospermia in whom no spermatozoa were found following a micro epididymal sperm aspiration and a simple testicular biopsy, we were able to retrieve spermatozoa in 35% of the men. The take home baby rate was 24% among couples with spermatozoa present upon TESE. De novo androgen deficiency occurred in 16% of the male patients following TESE indicating that, in men with NOA, long term hormonal follow up is recommended after TESE.

Citing Articles

Testicular mapping-guided sperm retrieval upfront microTESE in non-obstructive azoospermia: a comparison of sperm retrieval, pregnancy and live-birth rates.

Kapadia A, Greear G, Chen T, Ball D, McClure R, Ostrowski K Transl Androl Urol. 2025; 13(12):2672-2680.

PMID: 39816230 PMC: 11732293. DOI: 10.21037/tau-24-362.


Micromapping testicular sperm extraction: A new technique for microscopic testicular sperm extraction in nonobstructive azoospermia.

Tai T, Miyamoto W, Fukuoka Y, Shibasaki S, Takahashi M, Okuyama N Reprod Med Biol. 2024; 23(1):e12566.

PMID: 38476958 PMC: 10927935. DOI: 10.1002/rmb2.12566.


Comparison of sperm retrieval rate between superficial and deep dissection during microscopic testicular sperm extraction.

Mandourah H, Alghafees M, Alali H, Alsuhaibani S, Gutub E, Aldosari L Urol Ann. 2024; 16(1):108-112.

PMID: 38415231 PMC: 10896327. DOI: 10.4103/ua.ua_22_23.


How Successful Is Surgical Sperm Retrieval in Klinefelter Syndrome?.

Kailash Y, Raheem A, Homa S Front Reprod Health. 2022; 3:636629.

PMID: 36303963 PMC: 9580639. DOI: 10.3389/frph.2021.636629.


Development and validation predictive models of sperm retrieval for azoospermic men undergoing testicular sperm aspiration: a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study.

Li J, Du C, Liu Z, Zhang F, Li L, Wu J J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022; 39(8):1779-1787.

PMID: 35870097 PMC: 9428087. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02531-y.


References
1.
Schlegel P . Testicular sperm extraction: microdissection improves sperm yield with minimal tissue excision. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14(1):131-5. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.1.131. View

2.
Comhaire F . Andropause: hormone replacement therapy in the ageing male. Eur Urol. 2000; 38(6):655-62. DOI: 10.1159/000020358. View

3.
Westlander G, Ekerhovd E, Granberg S, Lycke N, Nilsson L, Werner C . Serial ultrasonography, hormonal profile and antisperm antibody response after testicular sperm aspiration. Hum Reprod. 2001; 16(12):2621-7. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/16.12.2621. View

4.
Bouloux P, Warne D, Loumaye E . Efficacy and safety of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in men with isolated hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Fertil Steril. 2002; 77(2):270-3. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)02973-9. View

5.
Schill T, Bals-Pratsch M, Kupker W, Sandmann J, Johannisson R, Diedrich K . Clinical and endocrine follow-up of patients after testicular sperm extraction. Fertil Steril. 2003; 79(2):281-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)04663-0. View