» Articles » PMID: 16506475

Complications with Cervical Arthroplasty

Overview
Date 2006 Mar 2
PMID 16506475
Citations 59
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Object: Spinal arthroplasty is becoming more widely performed in the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease. Although this new technology may offer benefits over arthrodesis, it also requires that the surgeon acquire new operative techniques, and new potential complications are introduced. To determine the incidence and distribution of perioperative complications, the authors analyzed their early data obtained in a series of patients treated with the Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis.

Methods: The authors prospectively recorded operative data, complications, and clinical and radiographic outcome data in all patients treated with Bryan prosthesis-based arthroplasty at two tertiary care centers since 2001. Patients underwent standard anterior cervical discectomy followed by one- to three-level arthroplasty. Ninety-six discs were implanted in 74 patients. The perioperative complication rate was 6.2% per treated level. In one patient a retropharyngeal hematoma developed, requiring evacuation. Neurological worsening occurred in three patients. Intraoperative migration of the prosthesis was observed in one two-level case, whereas delayed migration occurred in one patient with postoperative segmental kyphosis. In another patient with severe postoperative segmental kyphosis, revision was required with a customized lordotic prosthesis. Heterotopic ossification and spontaneous fusion occurred in two cases; motion was preserved in the remaining 94 prostheses. Partial dislocation of the prosthesis in extension occurred in one patient with preoperative segmental hypermobility, the first reported failure of a Bryan prosthesis. Twenty-five percent of patients reported neck and shoulder pain during the late follow-up period. There was a trend toward increased kyphosis of the C2-7 curvature postoperatively.

Conclusions: The Bryan prosthesis was effective in maintaining spinal motion. Major perioperative and device-related complications were infrequent.

Citing Articles

Complications and reoperations in young versus old patients undergoing cervical disc arthroplasty.

Nilssen P, Shafi K, Narendran N, Farivar D, Nomoto E, Mikhail C N Am Spine Soc J. 2025; 21:100589.

PMID: 40034338 PMC: 11875681. DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100589.


Risk Factors for Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Subsidence with Bryan Disc-A Retrospective Observational Analysis.

Lee C, Tung K, Tsou H, Chen W, Tzeng C, Lin R J Clin Med. 2024; 13(6).

PMID: 38541814 PMC: 10971363. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13061589.


Anterior transcorporeal approach combined with posterior translaminar approach in percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy for two-segment cervical disc herniation treatment: a technical report and early follow-up.

Wang Z, Du Q, Wang S, Su H, He W, Liao W J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):3.

PMID: 38167157 PMC: 10763675. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-04471-4.


Hybrid Implants in Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: The State of the Art and New Trends for Multilevel Degenerative Disc Disease.

Visocchi M, Marino S, Ducoli G, Barbagallo G, Pasqualino C, Signorelli F Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2023; 135:253-257.

PMID: 38153478 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-36084-8_39.


Comparison of discover cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc diseases: A meta-analysis of prospective, randomized controlled trials.

Wang Z, Luo G, Yu H, Zhao H, Li T, Yang H Front Surg. 2023; 10:1124423.

PMID: 36896262 PMC: 9989026. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1124423.