» Articles » PMID: 16450165

Interactions Between Cadence and Power Output Effects on Mechanical Efficiency During Sub Maximal Cycling Exercises

Overview
Specialty Physiology
Date 2006 Feb 2
PMID 16450165
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the interactions between cadence and power output effects on cycling efficiency. Fourteen healthy subjects performed four constant power output-tests (40, 80, 120 and 160 W) in which the cadence varied in five bouts from 40 to 120 rpm. Gross efficiency (GE) was determined over the last ten respiratory cycles of each bout and was calculated as the ratio of mechanical energy to energy expenditure. Results showed that (1) GE-cadence relationships reached a maximum at each power output corresponding to the cadence maximising efficiency (CAeff) and (2) GE increased with power output whatever the cadence until a maximal theoretical value. Moreover, interactions were found between these two factors: the cadence effect decreased linearly with power output and the power output effect increased exponentially with cadence. Consequently, cycling efficiency decreased more when cadence differed from CAeff at low than at high power output, and increased more with power output at high cadence than at low cadence. These interactions between cadence and power output effects on GE were mainly due to cadence and power output effects on the energy expenditure shares not contributing to power production.

Citing Articles

Everesting: cycling the elevation of the tallest mountain on Earth.

Swinnen W, Laughlin E, Hoogkamer W Eur J Appl Physiol. 2022; 122(12):2565-2574.

PMID: 36064982 PMC: 9444120. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-022-05032-z.


Determining optimal cadence for an individual road cyclist from field data.

Reed R, Scarf P, Jobson S, Passfield L Eur J Sport Sci. 2016; 16(8):903-11.

PMID: 26902667 PMC: 4989856. DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2016.1146336.


Low cadence interval training at moderate intensity does not improve cycling performance in highly trained veteran cyclists.

Kristoffersen M, Gundersen H, Leirdal S, Iversen V Front Physiol. 2014; 5:34.

PMID: 24550843 PMC: 3907705. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00034.


Cycling efficiency in trained male and female competitive cyclists.

Hopker J, Jobson S, Carter H, Passfield L J Sports Sci Med. 2013; 9(2):332-7.

PMID: 24149704 PMC: 3761728.


The relationship between cadence, pedalling technique and gross efficiency in cycling.

Leirdal S, Ettema G Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011; 111(12):2885-93.

PMID: 21437606 PMC: 3218268. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-011-1914-3.


References
1.
Francescato M, Girardis M, di Prampero P . Oxygen cost of internal work during cycling. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1995; 72(1-2):51-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF00964114. View

2.
Sanderson D . The influence of cadence and power output on the biomechanics of force application during steady-rate cycling in competitive and recreational cyclists. J Sports Sci. 1991; 9(2):191-203. DOI: 10.1080/02640419108729880. View

3.
Zoladz J, Duda K, Majerczak J . VO2/power output relationship and the slow component of oxygen uptake kinetics during cycling at different pedaling rates: relationship to venous lactate accumulation and blood acid-base balance. Physiol Res. 1999; 47(6):427-38. View

4.
Chavarren J, Calbet J . Cycling efficiency and pedalling frequency in road cyclists. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1999; 80(6):555-63. DOI: 10.1007/s004210050634. View

5.
Coast J, Welch H . Linear increase in optimal pedal rate with increased power output in cycle ergometry. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1985; 53(4):339-42. DOI: 10.1007/BF00422850. View