» Articles » PMID: 16440055

Retroviral Elements and Their Hosts: Insertional Mutagenesis in the Mouse Germ Line

Overview
Journal PLoS Genet
Specialty Genetics
Date 2006 Jan 28
PMID 16440055
Citations 215
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The inbred mouse is an invaluable model for human biology and disease. Nevertheless, when considering genetic mechanisms of variation and disease, it is important to appreciate the significant differences in the spectra of spontaneous mutations that distinguish these species. While insertions of transposable elements are responsible for only approximately 0.1% of de novo mutations in humans, the figure is 100-fold higher in the laboratory mouse. This striking difference is largely due to the ongoing activity of mouse endogenous retroviral elements. Here we briefly review mouse endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) and their influence on gene expression, analyze mechanisms of interaction between ERVs and the host cell, and summarize the variety of mutations caused by ERV insertions. The prevalence of mouse ERV activity indicates that the genome of the laboratory mouse is presently behind in the "arms race" against invasion.

Citing Articles

Activation of endogenous retroviruses characterizes the maternal-fetal interface in the BTBR mouse model of autism spectrum disorder.

Cipriani C, Camaioni A, Tartaglione A, Giudice M, Conti A, Petrone V Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):8271.

PMID: 40065061 PMC: 11894120. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-91541-8.


The rate and spectrum of new mutations in mice inferred by long-read sequencing.

Lopez-Cortegano E, Chebib J, Jonas A, Vock A, Kunzel S, Keightley P Genome Res. 2024; 35(1):43-54.

PMID: 39622636 PMC: 11789640. DOI: 10.1101/gr.279982.124.


The function of histone methyltransferase SETDB1 and its roles in liver cancer.

Zhang E, He P Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024; 12:1500263.

PMID: 39583200 PMC: 11582049. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1500263.


Stem cell activity-coupled suppression of endogenous retrovirus governs adult tissue regeneration.

Lyu Y, Kim S, Humphrey E, Nayak R, Guan Y, Liang Q Cell. 2024; 187(26):7414-7432.e26.

PMID: 39476839 PMC: 11682924. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.10.007.


The impact of retrotransposons on castor bean genomes.

Kong L, Zhang T, Ma L Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1397215.

PMID: 39109065 PMC: 11300327. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1397215.


References
1.
Lander E, Linton L, Birren B, Nusbaum C, Zody M, Baldwin J . Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature. 2001; 409(6822):860-921. DOI: 10.1038/35057062. View

2.
Kidwell M, Lisch D . Perspective: transposable elements, parasitic DNA, and genome evolution. Evolution. 2001; 55(1):1-24. DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb01268.x. View

3.
Whitelaw E, Martin D . Retrotransposons as epigenetic mediators of phenotypic variation in mammals. Nat Genet. 2001; 27(4):361-5. DOI: 10.1038/86850. View

4.
Li X, Scaringe W, Hill K, Roberts S, Mengos A, Careri D . Frequency of recent retrotransposition events in the human factor IX gene. Hum Mutat. 2001; 17(6):511-9. DOI: 10.1002/humu.1134. View

5.
Reik W, Dean W, Walter J . Epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Science. 2001; 293(5532):1089-93. DOI: 10.1126/science.1063443. View