» Articles » PMID: 16423390

Fabrication Methods of Porous Metals for Use in Orthopaedic Applications

Overview
Journal Biomaterials
Date 2006 Jan 21
PMID 16423390
Citations 152
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Implant stability is not only a function of strength but also depends on the fixation established with surrounding tissues [Robertson DM, Pierre L, Chahal R. Preliminary observations of bone ingrowth into porous materials. J Biomed Mater Res 1976;10:335-44]. In the past, such stability was primarily achieved using screws and bone cements. However, more recently, improved fixation can be achieved by bone tissue growing into and through a porous matrix of metal, bonding in this way the implant to the bone host. Another potentially valuable property of porous materials is their low elastic modulus. Depending on the porosity, moduli can even be tailored to match the modulus of bone closer than solid metals can, thus reducing the problems associated with stress shielding. Finally, extensive body fluid transport through the porous scaffold matrix is possible, which can trigger bone ingrowth, if substantial pore interconnectivity is established [Cameron HU, Macnab I, Pilliar RM. A porous metal system for joint replacement surgery. Int J Artif Organs 1978;1:104-9; Head WC, Bauk DJ, Emerson Jr RH. Titanium as the material of choice for cementless femoral components in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1995;85-90]. Over the years, a variety of fabrication processes have been developed, resulting in porous implant substrates that can address unresolved clinical problems. The advantages of metals exhibiting surface or bulk porosity have led researchers to conduct systematic research aimed at clarifying the fundamental aspects of interactions between porous metals and hard tissue. This review summarises all known methods for fabricating such porous metallic scaffolds.

Citing Articles

Innovative 3D-printed porous tantalum cage with non-window design to accelerate spinal fusion: A proof-of-concept study.

Liang H, Tu J, Wang B, Song Y, Wang K, Zhao K Mater Today Bio. 2025; 31:101576.

PMID: 40061212 PMC: 11889618. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101576.


The influence of internally architected voids in the creation of high-strength, low-weight 3D-printed cobalt-chromium prototypes.

Mohammed A, Al-Ali A Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2024; 21:21.

PMID: 38807659 PMC: 11132213.


Biomechanical Properties of Novel Porous Scaffold Core and Hollow Lateral Hole Pedicle Screws: A Comparative Study in Bama Pigs.

Hu Y, Chen X, Chu Z, Luo L, Gan Z, Zhong J Orthop Surg. 2024; 16(7):1718-1725.

PMID: 38766934 PMC: 11216838. DOI: 10.1111/os.14091.


Static 3D Osteoblast Cell Culture on 3D Printed Titanium Scaffolds.

Oliver-Urrutia C, Diez-Escudero A, Sumbalova Koledova Z, celko L, Hailer N, Montufar E Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2764:43-60.

PMID: 38393588 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3674-9_5.


A Review of Different Manufacturing Methods of Metallic Foams.

Hassan A, Alnaser I ACS Omega. 2024; 9(6):6280-6295.

PMID: 38371845 PMC: 10870358. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.3c08613.