» Articles » PMID: 16413899

Heat Production by 3 Implant Drill Systems After Repeated Drilling and Sterilization

Overview
Date 2006 Jan 18
PMID 16413899
Citations 43
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The goal was to measure heat generated in bone by 3 implant drill systems after repeated drilling and sterilization.

Materials And Methods: Temperature was measured with thermocouple technology in vitro using the bovine femoral cortical bone model. Intermittent drilling was accomplished at a constant 2.4-kg load and drill speed of 2,500 rpm. External irrigation at 40 mL/min with normal saline was used. Three implant drill systems-system A (triple twist drills with a relief angle), system B (triple twist drills without a relief angle), and system C (double twist drills with a relief angle)-were evaluated and heat was measured at the final drill in the drilling sequence (4.0 mm or 4.2 mm) at a depth of 15 mm. Thermocouples were placed 0.5 mm from the osteotomy at a depth of 15 mm. Heat measurements were recorded out to 25 uses.

Results: Results showed temperature increased with multiple uses. System A and C drills had temperature measurements that were below 47 degrees C, even after 25 uses. System B drills had temperatures that exceeded 47 degrees C from the initial use. Light microscopy showed little drill wear even after 25 uses.

Conclusions: Drill geometry plays a major role in heat production and may explain the increased temperature readings seen in system B. These drills lack relief angles and have the smallest clearance angles of the 3 systems. It also has fewer drills in its drilling sequence compared with systems A and C. This study shows that temperatures increase when drills are used multiple times. Systems A and C had acceptable temperature measurements out to 25 uses. System B drills showed significantly higher heat production with little visual signs of wear.

Citing Articles

In-vitro investigation of bone temperature changes in osteotomies performed with different brands of implant burs.

Sarkbay O, Mihmanli A, Cora H Int J Implant Dent. 2025; 11(1):11.

PMID: 39934526 PMC: 11813834. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-025-00588-9.


Microscopic Analysis and Evaluation of Thermal Elevation and Wear of Drills for Implant Site Preparation: An In Vitro Study.

Meme L, Bambini F, Pizzolante T, Principi M, Sampalmieri F, Mummolo S Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(22).

PMID: 39597348 PMC: 11595934. DOI: 10.3390/ma17225524.


Thermal Evaluation of Bone Drilling with a One-Drill Protocol.

Rugova S, Abboud M Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(10).

PMID: 39451398 PMC: 11503996. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11101022.


Temperature Changes (Δ) in Correlation with Number of Implant Osteotomy Preparations in Human Cadaver Tibiae, Comparing Osseodensification (OD) Burs in Clockwise (CW) versus Counterclockwise (CCW) Mode.

Soldatos N, Heydari A, Horton L, Sarrami S, Nordlie L, Choi D J Funct Biomater. 2024; 15(8).

PMID: 39194676 PMC: 11355330. DOI: 10.3390/jfb15080237.


"Compression Necrosis" - A Cause of Concern for Early Implant Failure? Case Report and Review of Literature.

Ramesh R, Sasi A, Mohamed S, Joseph S Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2024; 16:43-52.

PMID: 38469322 PMC: 10926919. DOI: 10.2147/CCIDE.S453798.