» Articles » PMID: 34697132

Heat Development During Medical Drilling: Influencing Factors and Examination Methods - Overview and First Results

Overview
Journal In Vivo
Specialty Oncology
Date 2021 Oct 26
PMID 34697132
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In many medical disciplines, the process of drilling into the bone plays a crucial role for the implantation or fixation of implants or reconstruction plates. During the bone drilling process, heat is generated on the drill head and within the surrounding tissue. As a result, the increased temperature can lead to thermal damage and related necrosis of the (bone) tissue. This tissue damage is dependent on different drilling parameters and can have important influence on the following tissue healing cascade and finally on implant surveillance. In this context, the present short review elucidates the current state of scientific knowledge with regard to the heat-triggering factors during the bony drilling process and how these factors can be better understood and prevented, now and in the future, through new research approaches. External and internal influencing factors during the drilling process are distinguished and methods to examine the temperature changes are compared. This mini-review further demonstrates first preliminary results of the inflammatory tissue reactions to inadequate drilling processes. Furthermore, possible solutions of new standardized ex vivo-measurement methods to better understand the factors influencing the development of heat and to reduce animal experiments are herein discussed.

Citing Articles

Comparison of One-Drill Protocol to Sequential Drilling In Vitro and In Vivo.

Rugova S, Abboud M Bioengineering (Basel). 2025; 12(1).

PMID: 39851324 PMC: 11762762. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering12010051.


Cranial reconstruction utilizing polymeric implants in two different designs: finite element investigation.

Shash Y BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):935.

PMID: 39563300 PMC: 11577651. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-08066-w.


Assessment of Thermal Osteonecrosis during Bone Drilling Using a Three-Dimensional Finite Element Model.

Chen Y, Tsai Y, Hsiao H, Chiu Y, Hong Y, Tu Y Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(6).

PMID: 38927828 PMC: 11200731. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11060592.


Cooling Efficiency of Sleeveless 3D-Printed Surgical Guides with Different Cylinder Designs.

Ali A, Brintouch I, Romanos G, Delgado-Ruiz R Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(2).

PMID: 38399527 PMC: 10889961. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60020239.


The 3D Printing and Evaluation of Surgical Guides with an Incorporated Irrigation Channel for Dental Implant Placement.

Tuce R, Neagu M, Pupazan V, Neagu A, Arjoca S Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(10).

PMID: 37892898 PMC: 10603942. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10101168.


References
1.
El-Kholey K, Ramasamy S, Kumar R S, Elkomy A . Effect of Simplifying Drilling Technique on Heat Generation During Osteotomy Preparation for Dental Implant. Implant Dent. 2017; 26(6):888-891. DOI: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000692. View

2.
Strbac G, Giannis K, Unger E, Mittlbock M, Vasak C, Watzek G . Drilling- and withdrawing-related thermal changes during implant site osteotomies. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013; 17(1):32-43. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12091. View

3.
Lee J, Chavez C, Park J . Parameters affecting mechanical and thermal responses in bone drilling: A review. J Biomech. 2018; 71:4-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.02.025. View

4.
Kim S, Yoo J, Kim Y, Shin S . Temperature change in pig rib bone during implant site preparation by low-speed drilling. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010; 18(5):522-7. PMC: 4246386. DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572010000500016. View

5.
Eriksson R, Albrektsson T, Magnusson B . Assessment of bone viability after heat trauma. A histological, histochemical and vital microscopic study in the rabbit. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984; 18(3):261-8. DOI: 10.3109/02844318409052849. View