» Articles » PMID: 16401435

Determination of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in the FIM Instrument in Patients with Stroke

Overview
Date 2006 Jan 13
PMID 16401435
Citations 137
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To define the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the FIM instrument in patients poststroke.

Design: Prospective case series discharged over a 9-month period.

Setting: Long-term acute care hospital.

Participants: Patients with stroke (N=113).

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures: Admission, discharge, and change scores were calculated for the total FIM, motor FIM, and cognitive FIM. Assessments of clinical change were rated at discharge on a 15-point (-7 to +7) Likert scale by attending physicians, with MCID defined at a cutoff score of 3. The FIM change scores associated with MCID were identified from receiver operating characteristic curves. Bayesian analysis was used to determine the probability of individual patients achieving MCID.

Results: FIM change scores associated with MCID were 22, 17, and 3 for the total FIM, motor FIM, and cognitive FIM, respectively. The accuracy of the MCID was greater when subjects were categorized based on admission FIM scores than when considering the sample as a whole. Larger FIM change scores were related to MCID in subjects with lower admission FIM scores.

Conclusions: These findings will assist in the interpretation of FIM change scores relative to physicians' assessments of important clinical change.

Citing Articles

Construct validity and responsiveness of clinical upper limb measures and sensor-based arm use within the first year after stroke: a longitudinal cohort study.

Pohl J, Verheyden G, Held J, Luft A, Easthope Awai C, Veerbeek J J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025; 22(1):14.

PMID: 39881332 PMC: 11776245. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01512-9.


Descriptive retrospective cross-sectional study of rehabilitation care for poststroke users in Québec during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Vakil P, Ferre P, Higgins J, Beaulieu L, Milot M, Boudrias M BMJ Open. 2025; 15(1):e082602.

PMID: 39880428 PMC: 11781130. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082602.


Rehabilitation outcomes after comprehensive post-acute inpatient rehabilitation following moderate to severe acquired brain injury-study protocol for an overall prognosis study based on routinely collected health data.

Pommerich U, Stubbs P, Nielsen J Diagn Progn Res. 2025; 9(1):1.

PMID: 39762957 PMC: 11706155. DOI: 10.1186/s41512-024-00183-3.


Overground robotic exoskeleton vs conventional therapy in inpatient stroke rehabilitation: results from a pragmatic, multicentre implementation programme.

Tam P, Tang N, Kamsani N, Yap T, Coffey-Aladdin I, Goh S J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025; 22(1):3.

PMID: 39762953 PMC: 11702026. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01536-1.


Effect of Increasing or Decreasing Use of Polypharmacy on Recovery of Activities of Daily Living in Patients With Stroke in the Recovery-Phase Rehabilitation Ward: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Propensity Score Matching.

Hanaoka S, Iwabuchi K, Hirai T, Seki T, Hayashi H Stroke Res Treat. 2024; 2024:2381790.

PMID: 39712951 PMC: 11661867. DOI: 10.1155/srat/2381790.