» Articles » PMID: 38890441

Sedentary Behaviour May Cause Differences in Physical Outcomes and Activities of Daily Living in Older Cardiovascular Disease Patients Participating in Phase I Cardiac Rehabilitation

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2024 Jun 18
PMID 38890441
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the rate of sedentary behaviour and differences in physical outcomes and activities of daily living (ADL) based on sedentary behaviour time of hospitalized older cardiovascular disease patients undergoing phase I cardiac rehabilitation. Older cardiovascular disease patients were enrolled from October 2020 to September 2023 and were divided into the high sedentary behaviour group (≥ 480 min/day) and low sedentary behaviour group (< 480 min/day). Patients' clinical characteristics, usual gait speed, and Five Times Sit to Stand Test time were compared as indices of physical outcomes. Motor, cognitive, and total Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores were used as indices of ADL and compared between groups using analysis of covariance. Final analysis included 402 patients (mean age: 76.7 years, female: 35.3%). The high sedentary behaviour group included 48.5% of the study patients. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, gait speed (0.80 ± 0.27 vs. 0.96 ± 0.23 m/s, p < 0.001) was lower and FTSST time (11.31 ± 4.19 vs. 9.39 ± 3.11 s, p < 0.001) was higher in the high sedentary behaviour group versus low sedentary behaviour group. Motor (85.82 ± 8.82 vs. 88.09 ± 5.04 points, p < 0.001), cognitive (33.32 ± 2.93 vs. 34.04 ± 2.24 points, p < 0.001), and total FIM scores (119.13 ± 10.66 vs. 122.02 ± 6.30 points, p < 0.001) were significantly lower in the high sedentary behaviour group versus low sedentary behaviour group after adjustment. In older cardiovascular disease patients in phase I cardiac rehabilitation, sedentary behaviour time might influence physical outcomes and ADL at discharge. It is thus important to consider the amount of sedentary behaviour time spent by these patients during daily life while hospitalized.

Citing Articles

Focusing on Sedentary Behavior in Comprehensive Cardiac Rehabilitation.

Izawa K, Oka K Circ Rep. 2024; 6(11):481-488.

PMID: 39525298 PMC: 11541182. DOI: 10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0098.


Association of sedentary behavior and physical activity with occurrence of signs and symptoms in participants of a cardiac rehabilitation program.

Silva J, Ribeiro F, Valente H, Vanzella L, Laurino M, do Nascimento G Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):22738.

PMID: 39349610 PMC: 11442860. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-74199-6.

References
1.
Iwata K, Kitai T, Yoshimura Y, Honda A, Shimogai T, Otsuka S . Clinical impact of functional independent measure (FIM) on 180-day readmission and mortality in elderly patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure. Heart Vessels. 2021; 36(10):1536-1541. DOI: 10.1007/s00380-021-01841-y. View

2.
Tsuji T, Sonoda S, Domen K, Saitoh E, Liu M, Chino N . ADL structure for stroke patients in Japan based on the functional independence measure. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1995; 74(6):432-8. DOI: 10.1097/00002060-199511000-00007. View

3.
Kitamura M, Izawa K, Yaekura M, Mimura Y, Nagashima H, Oka K . Differences in nutritional status and activities of daily living and mobility in elderly hospitalized patients with heart failure. ESC Heart Fail. 2019; 6(2):344-350. PMC: 6437428. DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.12393. View

4.
Yerrakalva D, Yerrakalva D, Hajna S, Griffin S . Effects of Mobile Health App Interventions on Sedentary Time, Physical Activity, and Fitness in Older Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2019; 21(11):e14343. PMC: 6908977. DOI: 10.2196/14343. View

5.
Cesari M, Kritchevsky S, Penninx B, Nicklas B, Simonsick E, Newman A . Prognostic value of usual gait speed in well-functioning older people--results from the Health, Aging and Body Composition Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005; 53(10):1675-80. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53501.x. View