» Articles » PMID: 16389980

Clinical Evaluation of Pulmonary Nodules with Dual-exposure Dual-energy Subtraction Chest Radiography

Overview
Journal Radiat Med
Date 2006 Jan 5
PMID 16389980
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of dual-exposure dual-energy (DE) subtraction chest radiography with flat-panel detector.

Materials And Methods: One hundred patients underwent dual-exposure DE subtraction chest radiography and chest CT for evaluation of pulmonary nodules. Fifty-two patients with pulmonary nodules and 48 patients with normal lungs were selected for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Ten radiologists who were unaware of the CT results evaluated chest radiography alone and chest radiography with DE subtraction images in the detection of pulmonary nodules. For each radiologist, we calculated the areas under the ROC curve (Az) for chest radiography alone and chest radiography with DE subtraction images.

Results: The average detectability of dual-exposure DE subtraction chest radiography was statistically significantly higher than that of chest radiography without subtraction images (mean Az value increased from 0.784 to 0.815, p<0.001).

Conclusion: Dual-exposure DE subtraction chest radiography improves diagnostic accuracy of pulmonary nodules.

Citing Articles

Effectiveness of one-shot dual-energy subtraction chest radiography with flat-panel detector in distinguishing between calcified and non-calcified nodules.

Minato K, Yamazaki M, Yagi T, Hirata T, Tominaga M, You K Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):9548.

PMID: 37308582 PMC: 10260954. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-36785-y.


Lung cancer screening by single-shot dual-energy subtraction using flat-panel detector.

Mogami H, Onoike Y, Miyano H, Arakawa K, Inoue H, Sakae K Jpn J Radiol. 2021; 39(12):1168-1173.

PMID: 34173973 PMC: 8639557. DOI: 10.1007/s11604-021-01163-z.


The potential application of dual-energy subtraction radiography for COVID-19 pneumonia imaging.

van der Heyden B Br J Radiol. 2021; 94(1120):20201384.

PMID: 33733827 PMC: 8010552. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20201384.


Efficiency and reporting confidence analysis of sequential dual-energy subtraction for thoracic x-ray examinations.

Gezer M, Algin O, Durmaz A, Arslan H Qatar Med J. 2019; 2019(1):9.

PMID: 31579657 PMC: 6755373. DOI: 10.5339/qmj.2019.9.


Diagnostic accuracy and added value of dual-energy subtraction radiography compared to standard conventional radiography using computed tomography as standard of reference.

Martini K, Baessler M, Baumueller S, Frauenfelder T PLoS One. 2017; 12(3):e0174285.

PMID: 28301584 PMC: 5354458. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174285.