» Articles » PMID: 16372169

Impedance is Modulated to Meet Accuracy Demands During Goal-directed Arm Movements

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2005 Dec 24
PMID 16372169
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The neuromuscular system is inherently noisy and joint impedance may serve to filter this noise. In the present experiment, we investigated whether individuals modulate joint impedance to meet spatial accuracy demands. Twelve subjects were instructed to make rapid, time constrained, elbow extensions to three differently sized targets. Some trials (20 out of 140 for each target, randomly assigned) were perturbed mechanically at 75% of movement amplitude. Inertia, damping and stiffness were estimated from the torque and angle deviation signal using a forward simulation and optimization routine. Increases in endpoint accuracy were not always reflected in a decrease in trajectory variability. Only in the final quarter of the trajectory the variability decreased as target width decreased. Stiffness estimates increased significantly with accuracy constraints. Damping estimates only increased for perturbations that were initially directed against the movement direction. We concluded that joint impedance modulation is one of the strategies used by the neuromuscular system to generate accurate movements, at least during the final part of the movement.

Citing Articles

The microstructure of intra- and interpersonal coordination.

Nazzaro G, Emanuele M, Laroche J, Esposto C, Fadiga L, DAusilio A Proc Biol Sci. 2023; 290(2011):20231576.

PMID: 37964525 PMC: 10646454. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.1576.


Reinforcement-based processes actively regulate motor exploration along redundant solution manifolds.

Roth A, Calalo J, Lokesh R, Sullivan S, Grill S, Jeka J Proc Biol Sci. 2023; 290(2009):20231475.

PMID: 37848061 PMC: 10581769. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.1475.


Neuromuscular control: from a biomechanist's perspective.

Mulla D, Keir P Front Sports Act Living. 2023; 5:1217009.

PMID: 37476161 PMC: 10355330. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1217009.


The sensorimotor system modulates muscular co-contraction relative to visuomotor feedback responses to regulate movement variability.

Calalo J, Roth A, Lokesh R, Sullivan S, Wong J, Semrau J J Neurophysiol. 2023; 129(4):751-766.

PMID: 36883741 PMC: 10069957. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00472.2022.


Humans modulate arm stiffness to facilitate motor communication during overground physical human-robot interaction.

Regmi S, Burns D, Song Y Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):18767.

PMID: 36335247 PMC: 9637182. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-23496-z.


References
1.
Milner T, Cloutier C . Damping of the wrist joint during voluntary movement. Exp Brain Res. 1998; 122(3):309-17. DOI: 10.1007/s002210050519. View

2.
Selen L, Beek P, van Dieen J . Can co-activation reduce kinematic variability? A simulation study. Biol Cybern. 2005; 93(5):373-81. DOI: 10.1007/s00422-005-0015-y. View

3.
Van Gemmert A, Van Galen G . Stress, neuromotor noise, and human performance: a theoretical perspective. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1997; 23(5):1299-313. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.23.5.1299. View

4.
Gribble P, Mullin L, Cothros N, Mattar A . Role of cocontraction in arm movement accuracy. J Neurophysiol. 2003; 89(5):2396-405. DOI: 10.1152/jn.01020.2002. View

5.
Todorov E, Jordan M . Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci. 2002; 5(11):1226-35. DOI: 10.1038/nn963. View