» Articles » PMID: 1577114

Time-varying Stiffness of Human Elbow Joint During Cyclic Voluntary Movement

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 1992 Jan 1
PMID 1577114
Citations 78
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the extent to which subjects modulate their elbow joint mechanical properties during ongoing arm movement. Small pseudo-random force disturbances were applied to the wrist with an airjet actuator while subjects executed large (1 rad) elbow joint movements. Using a lumped parameter model of the muscle, tendon and proprioceptive feedback dynamics, a time-varying system identification technique was developed to analyze the phasic changes in the elbow joint's mechanical response. The mechanical properties were found to be time-varying, and well approximated by a quasi-linear second-order model. The stiffness of the arm was found to drop during movement. The arm was always underdamped, with the damping ratio changing during movement. Inertia estimates were constant and consistent with previous measurements. Overall, the moving arm was found to be very compliant, with a peak stiffness value less than the lowest value measured during posture, and a natural frequency of less than 3 Hz. Changing the speed of movement, or the load from gravity, changed the stiffness measured, but not in strict proportion to the change in net muscle torque.

Citing Articles

Co-contraction embodies uncertainty: An optimal feedforward strategy for robust motor control.

Berret B, Verdel D, Burdet E, Jean F PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(11):e1012598.

PMID: 39565821 PMC: 11616891. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012598.


Brownian processes in human motor control support descending neural velocity commands.

Tessari F, Hermus J, Sugimoto-Dimitrova R, Hogan N Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):8341.

PMID: 38594312 PMC: 11004188. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-58380-5.


Human arm endpoint-impedance in rhythmic human-robot interaction exhibits cyclic variations.

Fortineau V, Siegler I, Makarov M, Rodriguez-Ayerbe P PLoS One. 2023; 18(12):e0295640.

PMID: 38096319 PMC: 10721195. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295640.


Dynamic primitives in constrained action: systematic changes in the zero-force trajectory.

Hermus J, Doeringer J, Sternad D, Hogan N J Neurophysiol. 2023; 131(1):1-15.

PMID: 37820017 PMC: 11286308. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00082.2023.


System identification: a feasible, reliable and valid way to quantify upper limb motor impairments.

van de Ruit M, van der Velden L, Onneweer B, Benner J, Haarman C, Ribbers G J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023; 20(1):67.

PMID: 37231496 PMC: 10210505. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-023-01192-x.


References
1.
Stein R, Gordon T . Nonlinear stiffness--force relationships in whole mammalian skeletal muscles. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1986; 64(9):1236-44. DOI: 10.1139/y86-209. View

2.
Feldman A . Superposition of motor programs--I. Rhythmic forearm movements in man. Neuroscience. 1980; 5(1):81-90. DOI: 10.1016/0306-4522(80)90073-1. View

3.
Kearney R, Hunter I . Dynamics of human ankle stiffness: variation with displacement amplitude. J Biomech. 1982; 15(10):753-6. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(82)90090-2. View

4.
Stein R, Capaday C . The modulation of human reflexes during functional motor tasks. Trends Neurosci. 1988; 11(7):328-32. DOI: 10.1016/0166-2236(88)90097-5. View

5.
Xu YMj , Hunter I, Hollerbach J, Bennett D . An airjet actuator system for identification of the human arm joint mechanical properties. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1991; 38(11):1111-22. DOI: 10.1109/10.99075. View