» Articles » PMID: 16346033

Kinetic Analysis of Competition Between Sulfate Reducers and Methanogens for Hydrogen in Sediments

Overview
Date 1982 Jun 1
PMID 16346033
Citations 82
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The competition between sulfate-reducing and methanogenic bacteria for hydrogen was investigated in eutrophic lake sediments that contained low in situ sulfate concentrations and in sulfate-amended sediments. Sulfate reduction and methane production coexisted in situ in lake surface sediments (0 to 2 cm), but methane production was the dominant terminal process. Addition of 10 to 20 mM sulfate to sediments resulted in a decrease in the hydrogen partial pressure and a concomitant inhibition of methane production over time. Molybdate inhibition of sulfate reduction in sulfate-amended sediments was followed by an increase in the hydrogen partial pressure and the methane production rate to values comparable to those in sediments not amended with sulfate. The sulfate reducer population had a half-saturation constant for hydrogen uptake of 141 pascals versus 597 pascals for the methanogen population. Thus, when sulfate was not limiting, the lower half-saturation constant of sulfate reducers enabled them to inhibit methane production by lowering the hydrogen partial pressure below levels that methanogens could effectively utilize. However, methanogens coexisted with sulfate reducers in the presence of sulfate, and the outcome of competition at any time was a function of the rate of hydrogen production, the relative population sizes, and sulfate availability.

Citing Articles

Impact of antibiotics, iron oxide, and sodium sulfate on microbial community composition in laboratory-built municipal solid waste microcosms.

Malas J, Khoury S, Tanzillo M, Fischer G, Bogner J, Meyer-Dombard D PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0318351.

PMID: 39874355 PMC: 11774356. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318351.


Control of hydrogen concentrations by microbial sulfate reduction in two contrasting anoxic coastal sediments.

Coon G, Williams L, Matthews A, Diaz R, Kevorkian R, LaRowe D Front Microbiol. 2024; 15:1455857.

PMID: 39600573 PMC: 11594503. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1455857.


Transcriptomic response of wetland microbes to root influence.

Gruterich L, Wilson M, Jensen K, Streit W, Mueller P iScience. 2024; 27(11):110890.

PMID: 39493876 PMC: 11530916. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110890.


Metaproteomics-informed stoichiometric modeling reveals the responses of wetland microbial communities to oxygen and sulfate exposure.

Wang D, Candry P, Hunt K, Flinkstrom Z, Shi Z, Liu Y NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2024; 10(1):55.

PMID: 38961111 PMC: 11222425. DOI: 10.1038/s41522-024-00525-5.


Disentangling the effects of sulfate and other seawater ions on microbial communities and greenhouse gas emissions in a coastal forested wetland.

de Mesquita C, Hartman W, Ardon M, Tringe S ISME Commun. 2024; 4(1):ycae040.

PMID: 38628812 PMC: 11020224. DOI: 10.1093/ismeco/ycae040.


References
1.
Abram J, Nedwell D . Inhibition of methanogenesis by sulphate reducing bacteria competing for transferred hydrogen. Arch Microbiol. 1978; 117(1):89-92. DOI: 10.1007/BF00689356. View

2.
Abram J, Nedwell D . Hydrogen as a substrate for methanogenesis and sulphate reduction in anaerobic saltmarsh sediment. Arch Microbiol. 1978; 117(1):93-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF00689357. View

3.
Bryant M, Campbell L, Reddy C, Crabill M . Growth of desulfovibrio in lactate or ethanol media low in sulfate in association with H2-utilizing methanogenic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977; 33(5):1162-9. PMC: 170843. DOI: 10.1128/aem.33.5.1162-1169.1977. View

4.
Strayer R, Tiedje J . Kinetic parameters of the conversion of methane precursors to methane in a hypereutrophic lake sediment. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1978; 36(2):330-40. PMC: 291222. DOI: 10.1128/aem.36.2.330-340.1978. View

5.
Smith R, Klug M . Reduction of sulfur compounds in the sediments of a eutrophic lake basin. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981; 41(5):1230-7. PMC: 243894. DOI: 10.1128/aem.41.5.1230-1237.1981. View