» Articles » PMID: 33782914

Dichotic Listening Performance with Cochlear-implant Simulations of Ear Asymmetry is Consistent with Difficulty Ignoring Clearer Speech

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology
Date 2021 Mar 30
PMID 33782914
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There are an increasing number of bilateral and single-sided-deafness cochlear-implant (CI) users who hope to achieve improved spatial-hearing abilities through access to sound in both ears. It is, however, unclear how speech is processed when inputs are functionally asymmetrical, which may have an impact on spatial-hearing abilities. Therefore, functionally asymmetrical hearing was controlled and parametrically manipulated using a channel vocoder as a CI simulation. In Experiment 1, normal-hearing (NH) listeners performed a dichotic listening task (i.e., selective attention to one ear, ignoring the other) using asymmetrical signal degradation. Spectral resolution varied independently in each ear (4, 8, 16 channels, and unprocessed control). Performance decreased with decreasing resolution in the target ear and increasing resolution in the interferer ear. In Experiment 2, these results were replicated using a divided attention task (attend to both ears, report one after sentence completion) in both NH and bilateral CI listeners, although overall performance was lower than in Experiment 1. In Experiment 3, frequency-to-place mismatch simulated shallow CI insertion depths (0, 3, 6-mm shifts, and unprocessed control). Performance mostly decreased with increasing shift in the target ear and decreasing shift in the interferer ear; however, performance nonmonotonicities occurred. The worst performance occurred when the shift matched across ears, suggesting that pitch similarity increases difficulty. The results show that it is more difficult to attend an ear that is relatively degraded or distorted, which may set spatial-hearing limitations for CI users when trying to attend to a target in complex auditory scenes.

Citing Articles

Reduced digit spans and ear dominance using dichotic digits in bimodal cochlear-implant users.

Blackmon A, Goupell M, Bakke M, Stakhovskaya O JASA Express Lett. 2024; 4(5).

PMID: 38727569 PMC: 11550484. DOI: 10.1121/10.0025977.


Review of Binaural Processing With Asymmetrical Hearing Outcomes in Patients With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Anderson S, Burg E, Suveg L, Litovsky R Trends Hear. 2024; 28:23312165241229880.

PMID: 38545645 PMC: 10976506. DOI: 10.1177/23312165241229880.


Effect of experimentally introduced interaural frequency mismatch on sentence recognition in bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.

Cleary M, DeRoy Milvae K, Nguyen N, Bernstein J, Goupell M JASA Express Lett. 2023; 3(4).

PMID: 37096891 PMC: 10080388. DOI: 10.1121/10.0017705.


Effect of experimentally introduced interaural frequency mismatch on sentence recognition in bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.

Cleary M, DeRoy Milvae K, Nguyen N, Bernstein J, Goupell M medRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 36711489 PMC: 9882401. DOI: 10.1101/2023.01.06.23284274.


Interaural asymmetry of dynamic range: Abnormal fusion, bilateral interference, and shifts in attention.

Anderson S, Gallun F, Litovsky R Front Neurosci. 2023; 16:1018190.

PMID: 36699517 PMC: 9869277. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1018190.


References
1.
Knudsen L, Oberg M, Nielsen C, Naylor G, Kramer S . Factors influencing help seeking, hearing aid uptake, hearing aid use and satisfaction with hearing aids: a review of the literature. Trends Amplif. 2010; 14(3):127-54. PMC: 4111466. DOI: 10.1177/1084713810385712. View

2.
Cleary M, Wilkinson T, Wilson L, Goupell M . Memory Span for Spoken Digits in Adults With Cochlear Implants or Typical Hearing: Effects of Age and Identification Ability. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018; 61(8):2099-2114. PMC: 6198923. DOI: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-H-17-0245. View

3.
Shannon R, Zeng F, Wygonski J . Speech recognition with altered spectral distribution of envelope cues. J Acoust Soc Am. 1999; 104(4):2467-76. DOI: 10.1121/1.423774. View

4.
Whitmer W, Seeber B, Akeroyd M . Apparent auditory source width insensitivity in older hearing-impaired individuals. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012; 132(1):369-79. PMC: 3566657. DOI: 10.1121/1.4728200. View

5.
Gordon K, Henkin Y, Kral A . Asymmetric Hearing During Development: The Aural Preference Syndrome and Treatment Options. Pediatrics. 2015; 136(1):141-53. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2014-3520. View