» Articles » PMID: 16305846

Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Stage I and II Esophageal Cancer

Overview
Journal Ann Thorac Surg
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2005 Nov 25
PMID 16305846
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To evaluate whether thoracoscopic and video-assisted dissections are appropriate modalities, we assessed the mortality, morbidity, and survival of patients who underwent a thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Methods: Between November 1995 and December 2004, thoracoscopic and video-assisted esophagectomies were performed on 112 (72.7%) patients out of 154 who underwent surgical resection for thoracic and abdominal esophageal cancer. The histologic type of cancer was squamous cell carcinoma in 109 (97.4%) patients and adenocarcinoma in 3 (2.6%).

Results: Intraoperative complications occurred in 4 (3.6%) patients: tracheal injury in 3 (2.7%) and azygos vein injury in 1 (0.8%). The 30-day mortality rate was 0.8%. Early postoperative complications occurred in 29 (25.9%) patients including the following: recurrent nerve palsy in 10 (8.9%), respiratory complication in 7 (6.3%), anastomotic leakage in 9 (8.0%) with major leakage requiring reanastomosis in 4 (3.6%) of these 9, and chylothorax in 3 (2.7%). Induction chemoradiotherapy, preoperative concomitant disease, and reconstruction using the colon did not increase morbidity. Port site recurrence occurred in 3 (2.7%) patients. The overall 5-year survival rate was 52%. For stage I disease, the 5-year survival rate of patients was 87.2%. In stage II disease, it was 70.2%.

Conclusions: Thoracoscopic and video-assisted esophagectomy are considered feasible and safe options for the treatment of esophageal cancer, but further investigation is necessary. The survival of patients with stage I and II disease is satisfactory at the present time.

Citing Articles

How to distinguish thoracic and cervical lymph nodes during minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Zeng T, Chen M, Cai B, Zheng W, Xu C, Xu G Thorac Cancer. 2022; 13(17):2436-2442.

PMID: 35852040 PMC: 9436676. DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.14554.


Innovative operation concept and practice: preoperative precise planning is benefit for lung function protection of early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by robotic surgical system.

Chen L, Chen X, Yu S, Kang M J Thorac Dis. 2020; 12(5):2824-2826.

PMID: 32642191 PMC: 7330410. DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2020.03.116.


Postoperative complications of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Ozawa S, Koyanagi K, Ninomiya Y, Yatabe K, Higuchi T Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2020; 4(2):126-134.

PMID: 32258977 PMC: 7105848. DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12315.


Esophagectomy from then to now.

Takahashi C, Shridhar R, Huston J, Meredith K J Gastrointest Oncol. 2018; 9(5):903-909.

PMID: 30505593 PMC: 6219976. DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2018.08.15.


Anastomotic leakage after intrathoracic versus cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis for oesophageal carcinoma in Chinese population: a retrospective cohort study.

Liu Y, Fan J, He H, Zhu S, Chen Q, Cao R BMJ Open. 2018; 8(9):e021025.

PMID: 30181184 PMC: 6129039. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021025.