» Articles » PMID: 19789930

Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2009 Oct 1
PMID 19789930
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Minimally invasive esophagectomy has gained popularity over the past two decades. The procedural goal is to decrease the high overall morbidity of a traditional open esophageal resection. The entire spectrum of open esophagectomy techniques has been successfully replicated in a minimally invasive fashion.

Discussion: Esophagectomy remains one of the most technically challenging operations, and developing the skills necessary for minimal invasive esophagectomy is associated with a steep learning curve. Minimally invasive approaches show most promise for benign disease and select early esophageal cancers, but their role in more advanced cancer remains controversial due to lack of long-term results.

Conclusion: As minimally invasive esophagectomy matures, its true value in both benign and malignant disorders will become better defined.

Citing Articles

The impact of surgical assistants on postoperative complications in robot-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma.

Wang X, Lu T, Guo W, Cao Y, Li C, Li H Front Surg. 2024; 11:1492651.

PMID: 39634482 PMC: 11615134. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1492651.


Risk Factor Analysis for Developing Major Complications Following Esophageal Surgery-A Two-Center Study.

Stuben B, Plitzko G, Stern L, Schmeding R, Karstens K, Reeh M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(4).

PMID: 38398449 PMC: 10889828. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13041137.


Preoperative Risk Stratification in Esophageal Cancer Surgery: Comparing Risk Models with the Clinical Judgment of the Surgeon.

Hagens E, Cui N, van Dieren S, Eshuis W, Lameris W, van Berge Henegouwen M Ann Surg Oncol. 2023; 30(8):5159-5169.

PMID: 37120485 PMC: 10319689. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13473-9.


Endoscopic vacuum therapy for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: a retrospective analysis at a tertiary university center.

El-Sourani N, Miftode S, Bockhorn M Surg Open Sci. 2022; 11:69-72.

PMID: 36570626 PMC: 9772578. DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2022.12.003.


Short-term outcomes of Ivor Lewis vs. McKeown esophagectomy: A meta-analysis.

Xing H, Hu M, Wang Z, Jiang Y Front Surg. 2022; 9:950108.

PMID: 36386496 PMC: 9649905. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.950108.


References
1.
Rizk N, Bach P, Schrag D, Bains M, Turnbull A, Karpeh M . The impact of complications on outcomes after resection for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2003; 198(1):42-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.08.007. View

2.
Peyre C, DeMeester S, Rizzetto C, Bansal N, Tang A, Ayazi S . Vagal-sparing esophagectomy: the ideal operation for intramucosal adenocarcinoma and barrett with high-grade dysplasia. Ann Surg. 2007; 246(4):665-71. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318155a7a1. View

3.
Nigro J, Hagen J, DeMeester T, Demeester S, Peters J, Oberg S . Prevalence and location of nodal metastases in distal esophageal adenocarcinoma confined to the wall: implications for therapy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998; 117(1):16-23; discussion 23-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5223(99)70464-2. View

4.
Ell C, May A, Gossner L, Pech O, Gunter E, Mayer G . Endoscopic mucosal resection of early cancer and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2000; 118(4):670-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(00)70136-3. View

5.
Fabian T, Martin J, McKelvey A, Federico J . Minimally invasive esophagectomy: a teaching hospital's first year experience. Dis Esophagus. 2008; 21(3):220-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2007.00783.x. View