» Articles » PMID: 16273406

Influence of Motor Unit Properties on the Size of the Simulated Evoked Surface EMG Potential

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2005 Nov 8
PMID 16273406
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of the study was to quantify the influence of selected motor unit properties on the simulated amplitude and area of evoked muscle potentials detected at the skin surface. The study was restricted to a motor unit population simulating a hand muscle whose potentials were recorded on the skin over the muscle. Peak-to-peak amplitude and area of the evoked potential were calculated from the summed motor unit potentials and compared across conditions that simulated variation in different motor unit properties. The simulations involved varying the number of activated motor units, muscle fiber conduction velocities, axonal conduction velocities, neuronal activation times, the shape of the intracellular action potential, and recording configurations commonly used over hand muscles. The results obtained for the default condition simulated in this study indicated that ~7% of the motor unit potentials were responsible for 50% of the size of the evoked potential. Variation in the amplitude and area of the evoked muscle potential was directly related to the number of active motor units only when the stimulus activated motor units randomly, and not when activation was based on a parameter such as motor unit size. Independent adjustments in motor unit properties had variable effects on the size of the evoked muscle potential, including when the stimulus activated only a subpopulation of motor units. These results provide reference information that can be used to assist in the interpretation of experimentally observed changes in the size of evoked muscle potentials.

Citing Articles

Spinally targeted paired associated stimulation with high-frequency peripheral component induces spinal level plasticity in healthy subjects.

Natkynmaki A, Lauronen L, Haakana P, Kirveskari E, Avela J, Shulga A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):31052.

PMID: 39730811 PMC: 11680591. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-82271-4.


Surface Electromyography-Based Recognition of Electronic Taste Sensations.

Ullah A, Zhang F, Song Z, Wang Y, Zhao S, Riaz W Biosensors (Basel). 2024; 14(8).

PMID: 39194625 PMC: 11352680. DOI: 10.3390/bios14080396.


Corticospinal excitability across lower limb muscles in humans.

Eisner-Janowicz I, Chen B, Sangari S, Perez M J Neurophysiol. 2023; 130(3):788-797.

PMID: 37435645 PMC: 10648929. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00207.2023.


A myoelectric digital twin for fast and realistic modelling in deep learning.

Maksymenko K, Clarke A, Mendez Guerra I, Deslauriers-Gauthier S, Farina D Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):1600.

PMID: 36959193 PMC: 10036636. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-37238-w.


A Novel Method for Hand Movement Recognition Based on Wavelet Packet Transform and Principal Component Analysis with Surface Electromyogram.

Huo Y, Li F, Li Q, He E, Chen J Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022; 2022:8125186.

PMID: 36397787 PMC: 9666050. DOI: 10.1155/2022/8125186.


References
1.
Blok J, Stegeman D, van Oosterom A . Three-layer volume conductor model and software package for applications in surface electromyography. Ann Biomed Eng. 2002; 30(4):566-77. DOI: 10.1114/1.1475345. View

2.
Day B, Rothwell J, Thompson P, Dick J, Cowan J, Berardelli A . Motor cortex stimulation in intact man. 2. Multiple descending volleys. Brain. 1987; 110 ( Pt 5):1191-209. DOI: 10.1093/brain/110.5.1191. View

3.
Dengler R, Stein R, Thomas C . Axonal conduction velocity and force of single human motor units. Muscle Nerve. 1988; 11(2):136-45. DOI: 10.1002/mus.880110209. View

4.
McGill K, Lateva Z . The contribution of the interosseous muscles to the hypothenar compound muscle action potential. Muscle Nerve. 1999; 22(1):6-15. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(199901)22:1<6::aid-mus4>3.0.co;2-2. View

5.
Di Lazzaro V, Oliviero A, Pilato F, Saturno E, Dileone M, Mazzone P . The physiological basis of transcranial motor cortex stimulation in conscious humans. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004; 115(2):255-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2003.10.009. View