» Articles » PMID: 25502005

Age and Gender Effects on Submental Motor-evoked Potentials

Overview
Journal Age (Dordr)
Publisher Springer
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2014 Dec 16
PMID 25502005
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It is not known whether there are age- and/or gender-related differences in magnitude of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) of the submental muscles. Knowledge of this is important in investigations of neurophysiological aspects of swallowing. Forty healthy participants (20 males, 20 females; 20 young [21-35 years], 20 old [53-88 years]) were recruited. Surface electromyography (EMG) electrodes were placed at midline underlying the submental muscle group. Age- and gender-related differences were evaluated in two neurophysiologic measures of swallowing: MEPs stimulated by single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the motor cortex and surface electromyography (sEMG) recorded from the same submental muscle group during non-stimulated swallows. The older participants had larger MEPs during saliva swallowing than the young participants (p = 0.04, d = 0.86). Conversely, the older participants had lower amplitude submental EMG activity during non-stimulated swallows (p = 0.045, d = 0.67). Gender had no significant effect on MEP magnitude and on submental activity during saliva swallowing. There were no effects of age or gender on MEP latencies. These findings suggest deterioration in muscle function with age in a sample of healthy adults presenting with functional swallowing. We speculate that muscular decline is partially ameliorated by increased cortical activity-i.e., increased submental MEPs-so as to preserve swallowing function in healthy older subjects. These findings emphasize the need for different reference points for evaluation of submental MEPs of different age groups.

Citing Articles

Gender-Specific Interactions in a Visual Object Recognition Task in Persons with Opioid Use Disorder.

Petrie J, Kowallis L, Kamhout S, Bills K, Adams D, Fleming D Biomedicines. 2023; 11(9).

PMID: 37760905 PMC: 10525754. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11092460.


Effectiveness of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Post-Stroke Dysphagia: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Alamer A, Melese H, Nigussie F Clin Interv Aging. 2020; 15:1521-1531.

PMID: 32943855 PMC: 7481288. DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S262596.


A Commentary on Gender Does Not Matter: Add-on Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Treatment for Female Methamphetamine Dependents.

Zeng Y, Zheng H, He W Front Neural Circuits. 2020; 14:27.

PMID: 32655377 PMC: 7325321. DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2020.00027.


Comparison of EMG power during sleep from the submental and frontalis muscles.

Levendowski D, St Louis E, Strambi L, Galbiati A, Westbrook P, Berka C Nat Sci Sleep. 2018; 10:431-437.

PMID: 30584382 PMC: 6287659. DOI: 10.2147/NSS.S189167.


Submental Muscle Activation During Lingual Tasks in Healthy Adults.

Oommen E, Kim Y J Nutr Health Aging. 2018; 22(9):1133-1137.

PMID: 30379315 DOI: 10.1007/s12603-018-1084-7.


References
1.
Burden A . How should we normalize electromyograms obtained from healthy participants? What we have learned from over 25 years of research. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2010; 20(6):1023-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.07.004. View

2.
Evans W . What is sarcopenia?. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995; 50 Spec No:5-8. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/50a.special_issue.5. View

3.
Wahab N, Jones R, Huckabee M . Effects of olfactory and gustatory stimuli on neural excitability for swallowing. Physiol Behav. 2010; 101(5):568-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.09.008. View

4.
Robbins J, Hamilton J, Lof G, Kempster G . Oropharyngeal swallowing in normal adults of different ages. Gastroenterology. 1992; 103(3):823-9. DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(92)90013-o. View

5.
Hamdy S, Aziz Q, Rothwell J, Singh K, Barlow J, Hughes D . The cortical topography of human swallowing musculature in health and disease. Nat Med. 1996; 2(11):1217-24. DOI: 10.1038/nm1196-1217. View