Improving Return to Work Research

Overview

Journal J Occup Rehabil

Publisher Springer

Specialties Occupational Medicine
Rehabilitation Medicine

Date 2005 Oct 29

PMID 16254748

Citations 61

Authors

Glenn Pransky

Robert Gatchel

Steven J Linton

Patrick Loisel

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Despite considerable multidisciplinary research on return to work (RTW), there has been only modest progress in implementation of study results, and little change in overall rates of work disability in developed countries.

Methods: Thirty RTW researchers, representing over 20 institutions, assembled to review the current state of the art in RTW research, to identify promising areas for further development, and to provide direction for future investigations.

Results And Conclusion: Six major themes were selected as priority areas: early risk prediction; psychosocial, behavioral and cognitive interventions; physical treatments; the challenge of implementing evidence in the workplace context; effective methods to engage multiple stakeholders; and identification of outcomes that are relevant to both RTW stakeholders and different phases of the RTW process. Understanding and preventing delayed RTW will require application of new concepts and study designs, better measures of determinants and outcomes, and more translational research. Greater stakeholder involvement and commitment, and methods to address the unique challenges of each situation are required.

Citing Articles

Return to work of major trauma survivors from a private level 1 trauma centre in South Africa.

Bharath F, Hanekom S, Estherhuizen T, Lupton-Smith A Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025; 51(1):17.

PMID: 39812813 PMC: 11735595. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-024-02712-7.

Work participation after receiving multidisciplinary treatment or acceptance and commitment therapy intervention for return to work: long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial among sick-listed individuals with mental disorders and/or....

Berglund E, Anderzen I, Helgesson M, Lytsy P, Andersen A BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):3558.

PMID: 39709368 PMC: 11663356. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-21116-1.

Evaluation of the Early Intervention Physiotherapist Framework for Injured Workers in Victoria, Australia: Data Analysis Follow-Up.

Khorshidi H, Aickelin U, De Silva A Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(15).

PMID: 37570445 PMC: 10418439. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11152205.

Tools to assess employment readiness for colorectal cancer survivors: A scoping review.

Ding M, Gane E, Wiffen H, Johnston V Cancer Med. 2023; 12(17):18327-18353.

PMID: 37559402 PMC: 10523978. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6432.

Smart Work Injury Management (SWIM) System: A Machine Learning Approach for the Prediction of Sick Leave and Rehabilitation Plan.

Ng P, Chen P, Sin Z, Lai S, Cheng A Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(2).

PMID: 36829666 PMC: 9952743. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10020172.

References

Pransky G, Benjamin K, Himmelstein J, MUNDT K, Morgan W, Feuerstein M . Work-related upper-extremity disorders: prospective evaluation of clinical and functional outcomes. J Occup Environ Med. 1999; 41(10):884-92. DOI: 10.1097/00043764-199910000-00009. View

Sullivan M, Feuerstein M, Gatchel R, Linton S, Pransky G . Integrating psychosocial and behavioral interventions to achieve optimal rehabilitation outcomes. J Occup Rehabil. 2005; 15(4):475-89. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-005-8029-9. View

Young A, Wasiak R, Roessler R, McPherson K, Anema J, Van Poppel M . Return-to-work outcomes following work disability: stakeholder motivations, interests and concerns. J Occup Rehabil. 2005; 15(4):543-56. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-005-8033-0. View

Burton W, Pransky G, Conti D, Chen C, Edington D . The association of medical conditions and presenteeism. J Occup Environ Med. 2004; 46(6 Suppl):S38-45. DOI: 10.1097/01.jom.0000126687.49652.44. View

Gatchel R . Musculoskeletal disorders: primary and secondary interventions. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2004; 14(1):161-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2003.09.007. View

Young A, Roessler R, Wasiak R, McPherson K, Van Poppel M, Anema J . A developmental conceptualization of return to work. J Occup Rehabil. 2005; 15(4):557-68. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-005-8034-z. View

Guzman J, Esmail R, Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, Irvin E, Bombardier C . Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: systematic review. BMJ. 2001; 322(7301):1511-6. PMC: 33389. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.322.7301.1511. View

Crook J, Milner R, Schultz I, Stringer B . Determinants of occupational disability following a low back injury: a critical review of the literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2002; 12(4):277-95. DOI: 10.1023/a:1020278708861. View

Buchbinder R, Jolley D, Wyatt M . 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Effects of a media campaign on back pain beliefs and its potential influence on management of low back pain in general practice. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26(23):2535-42. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200112010-00005. View

10.

Pransky G, Benjamin K, Fletcher K, Himmelstein J, Katz J . Work-related outcomes in occupational low back pain: a multidimensional analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27(8):864-70. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200204150-00017. View

11.

Loisel P, Durand M, Diallo B, Vachon B, Charpentier N, Labelle J . From evidence to community practice in work rehabilitation: the Quebec experience. Clin J Pain. 2003; 19(2):105-13. DOI: 10.1097/00002508-200303000-00005. View

12.

Linton S, Gross D, Schultz I, Main C, Cote P, Pransky G . Prognosis and the identification of workers risking disability: research issues and directions for future research. J Occup Rehabil. 2005; 15(4):459-74. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-005-8028-x. View

13.

Loisel P, Buchbinder R, Hazard R, Keller R, Scheel I, van Tulder M . Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: the challenge of implementing evidence. J Occup Rehabil. 2005; 15(4):507-24. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-005-8031-2. View

14.

Wyatt M, Underwood M, Scheel I, Cassidy J, Nagel P . Back pain and health policy research: the what, why, how, who, and when. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004; 29(20):E468-75. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000142226.62853.06. View

15.

Shaw W, Robertson M, Pransky G, McLellan R . Employee perspectives on the role of supervisors to prevent workplace disability after injuries. J Occup Rehabil. 2003; 13(3):129-42. DOI: 10.1023/a:1024997000505. View

16.

Krause N, Frank J, Dasinger L, Sullivan T, Sinclair S . Determinants of duration of disability and return-to-work after work-related injury and illness: challenges for future research. Am J Ind Med. 2001; 40(4):464-84. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.1116. View

17.

Wickizer T, Franklin G, Mootz R, Fulton-Kehoe D, Plaeger-Brockway R, Drylie D . A communitywide intervention to improve outcomes and reduce disability among injured workers in Washington State. Milbank Q. 2004; 82(3):547-67, table of contents. PMC: 2690225. DOI: 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00321.x. View

18.

Staal J, Rainville J, Fritz J, van Mechelen W, Pransky G . Physical exercise interventions to improve disability and return to work in low back pain: current insights and opportunities for improvement. J Occup Rehabil. 2005; 15(4):491-505. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-005-8030-3. View

19.

Linton S . Early identification and intervention in the prevention of musculoskeletal pain. Am J Ind Med. 2002; 41(5):433-42. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.10052. View

20.

Bernacki E, Guidera J, Schaefer J, Tsai S . A facilitated early return to work program at a large urban medical center. J Occup Environ Med. 2000; 42(12):1172-7. DOI: 10.1097/00043764-200012000-00010. View