» Articles » PMID: 12966688

Employee Perspectives on the Role of Supervisors to Prevent Workplace Disability After Injuries

Overview
Journal J Occup Rehabil
Publisher Springer
Date 2003 Sep 12
PMID 12966688
Citations 48
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

After workplace injuries, supervisors can play an important role in aiding workers, accessing health care services, and providing reasonable accommodation. However, few studies have identified those aspects of supervisor involvement most valued by employees for postinjury recovery and return to work. As part of needs assessment for a supervisory training program, 30 employees from four companies were interviewed about the role of supervisors to prevent workplace disability after injuries. From interview notes, 305 employee statements were extracted for analysis. An affinity mapping process with an expert panel produced 11 common themes: accommodation, communicating with workers, responsiveness, concern for welfare, empathy/support, validation, fairness/respect, follow-up, shared decision-making, coordinating with medical providers, and obtaining coworker support of accommodation. Interpersonal aspects of supervision may be as important as physical work accommodation to facilitate return to work after injury.

Citing Articles

Patients' Needs Regarding Work-Focused Healthcare: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis.

Hagendijk M, Zipfel N, Melles M, van der Wees P, Hulshof C, Zwaan E J Occup Rehabil. 2024; .

PMID: 39052178 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-024-10225-8.


Getting an outsider's perspective - sick-listed workers' experiences with early follow-up sessions in the return to work process: a qualitative interview study.

Standal M, Foldal V, Aasdahl L, Fors E, Solbjor M BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):609.

PMID: 38724997 PMC: 11080128. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11007-x.


Work as an arena for health-Supervisors' experiences with attending to employees' sick leave and return-to-work process.

Klevanger N, Aasdahl L, Rise M PLoS One. 2023; 18(4):e0284369.

PMID: 37058510 PMC: 10104318. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284369.


Aligning stakeholders' understandings of the return-to-work process: a qualitative study on workplace meetings in inpatient multimodal occupational rehabilitation.

Klevanger N, Fimland M, Rise M Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2021; 16(1):1946927.

PMID: 34278973 PMC: 8291062. DOI: 10.1080/17482631.2021.1946927.


Work-life balance predicted work ability two years later: a cohort study of employees in the Swedish energy and water sector.

Berglund E, Anderzen I, Andersen A, Lindberg P BMC Public Health. 2021; 21(1):1212.

PMID: 34167506 PMC: 8223187. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11235-4.


References
1.
Kushnir T, Luria O . Supervisors' attitudes toward return to work after myocardial infarction or coronary artery bypass graft. J Occup Environ Med. 2002; 44(4):331-7. DOI: 10.1097/00043764-200204000-00013. View

2.
Marhold C, Linton S, Melin L . Identification of obstacles for chronic pain patients to return to work: evaluation of a questionnaire. J Occup Rehabil. 2002; 12(2):65-75. DOI: 10.1023/a:1015056429505. View

3.
Shannon H, WALTERS V, Lewchuck W, Richardson J, Moran L, Haines T . Workplace organizational correlates of lost-time accident rates in manufacturing. Am J Ind Med. 1996; 29(3):258-68. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199603)29:3<258::AID-AJIM5>3.0.CO;2-M. View

4.
Pransky G, Benjamin K, Himmelstein J, Fletcher K, Katz J, Johnson W . Outcomes in work-related upper extremity and low back injuries: results of a retrospective study. Am J Ind Med. 2000; 37(4):400-9. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(200004)37:4<400::aid-ajim10>3.0.co;2-c. View

5.
Wood D . Design and evaluation of a back injury prevention program within a geriatric hospital. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987; 12(2):77-82. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198703000-00001. View