» Articles » PMID: 16243546

Abnormalities of Hippocampal Surface Structure in Very Mild Dementia of the Alzheimer Type

Overview
Journal Neuroimage
Specialty Radiology
Date 2005 Oct 26
PMID 16243546
Citations 88
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To better define the pattern of hippocampal deformity early in the course of Alzheimer's disease, we compared the pattern of hippocampal surface variation in subjects with very mild dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT) and nondemented subjects. The surface of the hippocampus was divided a priori on a neuroanatomical template into three zones approximating the locations of underlying subfields [Csernansky, J.G., Wang, L., Swank, J., Miller, J.P., Gado, M., McKeel, D., Miller, M.I., Morris, J.C., 2005. Preclinical detection of Alzheimer's disease: hippocampal shape and volume predict dementia onset in the elderly. NeuroImage 25, 783--792]; i.e., a lateral zone (LZ) approximating the CA1 subfield, a superior zone (SZ) approximating the combined CA2, CA3, CA4 subfields and the gyrus dentatus (GD), and an inferior-medial zone (IMZ) approximating the subiculum. Large-deformation high-dimensional brain mapping (HDBM-LD) was used to generate the hippocampal surfaces of all subjects and to register the surface zones across subjects. Average variations within each zone were calculated for the subjects with very mild DAT as compared to the average of the nondemented subjects. After correcting for multiple comparisons, the very mild DAT subjects showed significant inward variation in the left and right LZ, the left and right IMZ, but not in the left and right SZ as compared to nondemented subjects. In logistic regression analyses, inward variation of the left and right LZ or IMZ by 0.1 mm relative to the average of the nondemented subjects increased the odds of the subject being a very mild DAT subject (range-1.18 to 1.57) rather than being a nondemented subject. The odds ratios for the left and right SZ were not significant. These results represent a replication of our previous findings [Csernansky, J.G., Wang, L., Joshi, S., Miller, J.P., Gado, M., Kido, D., McKeel, D., Morris, J.C., Miller, M.I., 2000. Early DAT is distinguished from aging by high-dimensional mapping of the hippocampus. Neurology 55, 1636--1643.] and suggest that inward deformities of the hippocampal surface in proximity to the CA1 subfield and subiculum can be used to distinguish subjects with very mild DAT from nondemented subjects.

Citing Articles

Mammalian Models in Alzheimer's Research: An Update.

Sharma H, Chang K, Hulme J, An S Cells. 2023; 12(20).

PMID: 37887303 PMC: 10605533. DOI: 10.3390/cells12202459.


Fine scale hippocampus morphology variation cross 552 healthy subjects from age 20 to 80.

Yang Q, Cai S, Chen G, Yu X, Cattell R, Riklin Raviv T Front Neurosci. 2023; 17:1162096.

PMID: 37719158 PMC: 10501455. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1162096.


Hippocampal metabolic subregions and networks: Behavioral, molecular, and pathological aging profiles.

Maleki Balajoo S, Eickhoff S, Masouleh S, Plachti A, Waite L, Saberi A Alzheimers Dement. 2023; 19(11):4787-4804.

PMID: 37014937 PMC: 10698199. DOI: 10.1002/alz.13056.


Can hippocampal subfield measures supply information that could be used to improve the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease?.

Kannappan B, Te Nijenhuis J, Choi Y, Lee J, Choi K, Balzekas I PLoS One. 2022; 17(11):e0275233.

PMID: 36327265 PMC: 9632892. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275233.


Low Subicular Volume as an Indicator of Dementia-Risk Susceptibility in Old Age.

Kagerer S, Schroeder C, Van Bergen J, Schreiner S, Meyer R, Steininger S Front Aging Neurosci. 2022; 14:811146.

PMID: 35309894 PMC: 8926841. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.811146.


References
1.
Sheng J, Mrak R, Griffin W . Progressive neuronal DNA damage associated with neurofibrillary tangle formation in Alzheimer disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1998; 57(4):323-8. DOI: 10.1097/00005072-199804000-00003. View

2.
Miller M, Banerjee A, Christensen G, Joshi S, Khaneja N, Grenander U . Statistical methods in computational anatomy. Stat Methods Med Res. 1997; 6(3):267-99. DOI: 10.1177/096228029700600305. View

3.
Hsu Y, Schuff N, Du A, Mark K, Zhu X, Hardin D . Comparison of automated and manual MRI volumetry of hippocampus in normal aging and dementia. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002; 16(3):305-10. PMC: 1851676. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.10163. View

4.
Csernansky J, Hamstra J, Wang L, McKeel D, Price J, Gado M . Correlations between antemortem hippocampal volume and postmortem neuropathology in AD subjects. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2004; 18(4):190-5. View

5.
Wang L, Swank J, Glick I, Gado M, Miller M, Morris J . Changes in hippocampal volume and shape across time distinguish dementia of the Alzheimer type from healthy aging. Neuroimage. 2003; 20(2):667-82. DOI: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00361-6. View