» Articles » PMID: 16235315

Fluticasone Versus Placebo for Chronic Asthma in Adults and Children

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2005 Oct 20
PMID 16235315
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) is a relatively new inhaled corticosteroid for the treatment of asthma.

Objectives: 1. To assess efficacy and safety outcomes in studies that compared FP to placebo for treatment of chronic asthma.2. To explore the presence of a dose-response effect.

Search Strategy: We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register (January 2005), reference lists of articles, contacted trialists and searched abstracts of major respiratory society meetings (1997-2004).

Selection Criteria: Randomised trials in children and adults comparing FP to placebo in the treatment of chronic asthma. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and methodological quality.

Data Collection And Analysis: Two reviewers extracted data. Quantitative analyses were undertaken using RevMan 4.2

Main Results: Seventy-five studies met the inclusion criteria (14,208 participants). Methodological quality was high. In non-oral steroid treated asthmatics with mild and moderate disease FP resulted in improvements from baseline compared with placebo across all dose ranges (100 to 1000 mcg/d) in FEV1 (between 0.13 to 0.45 litres); morning PEF (between 23 and 47 L/min); symptom scores (based on a standardised scale, between 0.5 and 0.85); reduction in rescue beta-2 agonist use (between 1.2 and 2.2 puffs/day). High dose FP increased the number of patients who could withdraw from prednisolone: FP 1000-1500 mcg/day Peto Odds Ratio 14.07 (95% CI 7.17 to 27.57). FP at all doses led to a greater likelihood of sore throat, hoarseness and oral Candidiasis. Twenty-one patients would need to be treated for one extra to develop Candidiasis (FP 500 mcg/day), whilst only three or four patients need to be treated to avoid one extra patient being withdrawn due to lack of efficacy at all doses of FP.

Authors' Conclusions: Doses of FP in the range 100-1000 mcg/day are effective. In most patients with mild-moderate asthma improvements with low dose FP are only a little less than those associated with high doses when compared with placebo. High dose FP appears to have worthwhile oral-corticosteroid reducing properties. FP use is accompanied by an increased likelihood of oropharyngeal side effects.

Citing Articles

Differences in the effectiveness of single, dual, and triple inhaled corticosteroid therapy for reducing future risk of severe asthma exacerbation: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Yamasaki A, Tomita K, Inui G, Okazaki R, Harada T Heliyon. 2024; 10(12):e31186.

PMID: 39022061 PMC: 11252599. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31186.


Impact of treatment adherence and inhalation technique on asthma outcomes of pediatric patients: a longitudinal study.

Lizano-Barrantes C, Garin O, Mayoral K, Dima A, Pont A, Caballero-Rabasco M Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1340255.

PMID: 38549668 PMC: 10976946. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1340255.


GEMA 5.3. Spanish Guideline on the Management of Asthma.

Plaza Moral V, Alobid I, Alvarez Rodriguez C, Blanco Aparicio M, Ferreira J, Garcia G Open Respir Arch. 2023; 5(4):100277.

PMID: 37886027 PMC: 10598226. DOI: 10.1016/j.opresp.2023.100277.


Impact of Unmet Social Needs, Scarcity, and Future Discounting on Adherence to Treatment in Children With Asthma: Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study.

Drouin O, Perez T, Barnett T, Ducharme F, Fleegler E, Garg A JMIR Res Protoc. 2023; 12:e37318.

PMID: 36881458 PMC: 10131837. DOI: 10.2196/37318.


Does the use of inhaled corticosteroids in asthma benefit lung function in the long-term? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tan D, Bui D, Dai X, Lodge C, Lowe A, Thomas P Eur Respir Rev. 2021; 30(159).

PMID: 33472957 PMC: 9488672. DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0185-2020.