» Articles » PMID: 16224038

The Safety of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement in Patients with Existing Ventriculoperitoneal Shunts

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2005 Oct 15
PMID 16224038
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Because the insertion of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes (PEG) involves disruption of the gastrointestinal tract with potential peritoneal contamination, patients with indwelling ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunts could be at increased risk of meningitis, a potentially devastating infection. The safety of PEG placement in the presence of a VP shunt is unclear.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed that included all adult patients with existing VP shunts requiring PEG placement at a single university medical center over an approximate 9-year period from July 1995 to March 2004.

Results: Thirty-nine patients who underwent PEG placement 2-564 days after shunt placement were identified. Two patients (5%) subsequently developed meningitis. Cerebrospinal fluid cultures demonstrated Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis. These infections occurred 2 and 15 months after PEG placement, respectively. At the time of PEG placement, 17 patients (44%) were receiving antibiotics for reasons other than operative prophylaxis, and 11 patients (28%) received prophylactic antibiotics. Both infected patients had received antibiotics at the time of PEG placement.

Conclusions: These data constitute the largest series of patients with existing VP shunts undergoing PEG placement reported to date. When compared with the published 2%-5% infection rate for patients with VP shunts alone, our data do not suggest an increased risk of infection for patients after PEG placement. As the total number of adult patients requiring a PEG after VP shunt placement is low, multicenter studies should be carried out to better stratify this risk.

Citing Articles

Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt and Gastrostomy Tube Placement and Timing: A Database Analysis.

Hallan D, Rizk E Cureus. 2022; 14(4):e23776.

PMID: 35530882 PMC: 9067355. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.23776.


Survival Rate and Shunt Infection Incidence Following Gastrostomy in Adult Patients with an Existing Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt.

Mawatari F, Shimizu T, Miyaaki H, Arima T, Fukuda S, Kita Y Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2021; 61(12):758-765.

PMID: 34629351 PMC: 8666294. DOI: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2021-0165.


Risk of ventriculoperitoneal shunt infection with coexisting percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube and associated factors.

Tyler K, Leon S, Lowe S, Kellogg R, Lena J, Privette A Heliyon. 2020; 6(3):e03523.

PMID: 32211540 PMC: 7082506. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03523.


Acute Shunt Malfunction Caused by Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy without Shunt Infection.

Choi J, Ki S, Park S J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2014; 56(4):361-3.

PMID: 25371790 PMC: 4219198. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2014.56.4.361.


Is percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement safe in patients with ventriculoperitoneal shunts?.

Kim J, Park Y, Kim H, Cho Y, Kim S, Youn N World J Gastroenterol. 2009; 15(25):3148-52.

PMID: 19575495 PMC: 2705738. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.15.3148.