» Articles » PMID: 16216688

Evidence for a Neural Correlate of a Framing Effect: Bias-specific Activity in the Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex During Credibility Judgments

Overview
Journal Brain Res Bull
Specialty Neurology
Date 2005 Oct 12
PMID 16216688
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Neural processes within the medial prefrontal cortex play a crucial role in assessing and integrating emotional and other implicit information during decision-making. Phylogenetically, it was important for the individual to assess the relevance of all kinds of environmental stimuli in order to adapt behavior in a flexible manner. Consequently, we can in principle not exclude that environmental information covertly influences the evaluation of actually decision relevant facts ("framing effect").

Objective: To test the hypothesis that the medial prefrontal cortex is involved into a framing effect we employed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during a binary credibility judgment task.

Methods: Twenty-one subjects were asked to judge 30 normalized news magazine headlines by forced answers as "true" or "false". To confound the judgments by formally irrelevant framing information we presented each of the headlines in four different news magazines characterized by varying credibility. For each subject the susceptibility to the judgment confounder (framing information) was assessed by magazine-specific modifications of the answers given.

Results: We could show that individual activity changes of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex during the judgments correlate with the degree of an individual's susceptibility to the framing information.

Conclusion: We found (i) a neural correlate of a framing effect as postulated by behavioral decision theorists that (ii) reflects interindividual differences in the degree of the susceptibility to framing information.

Citing Articles

Understanding the Changes in Brain Activation When Viewing Products with Differences in Attractiveness.

Sin E, Wong C, Chau B, Rauterberg M, Siu K, Shih Y Neurol Int. 2024; 16(5):918-932.

PMID: 39311342 PMC: 11417844. DOI: 10.3390/neurolint16050069.


Unlocking the neural mechanisms of consumer loan evaluations: an fNIRS and ML-based consumer neuroscience study.

Cakar T, Son-Turan S, Girisken Y, Sayar A, Ertugrul S, Filiz G Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 18:1286918.

PMID: 38375365 PMC: 10875049. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1286918.


Unraveling neural pathways of political engagement: bridging neuromarketing and political science for understanding voter behavior and political leader perception.

Cakar T, Filiz G Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 17:1293173.

PMID: 38188505 PMC: 10771297. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1293173.


Why it is good to communicate the bad: understanding the influence of message framing in persuasive communication on consumer decision-making processes.

Gier N, Krampe C, Kenning P Front Hum Neurosci. 2023; 17:1085810.

PMID: 37731668 PMC: 10508293. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1085810.


Neural mechanisms of brand love relationship dynamics: Is the development of brand love relationships the same as that of interpersonal romantic love relationships?.

Watanuki S Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:984647.

PMID: 36440289 PMC: 9686448. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.984647.