Why It is Good to Communicate the Bad: Understanding the Influence of Message Framing in Persuasive Communication on Consumer Decision-making Processes

Overview

Journal Front Hum Neurosci

Specialty Neurology

Date 2023 Sep 21

PMID 37731668

Authors

Nadine R Gier

Caspar Krampe

Peter Kenning

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: One approach to bridging the gap between consumer intentions and behavior is persuasive communication to reinforce their intentions and thereby support their behavior change. Message framing has proven to be a useful, persuasive communication tool. However, message framing is considered more complicated than other types of framing because, in addition to concept-specific elements, it is also strongly influenced by and, in turn, influences emotions. Therefore, it is almost impossible for consumers to verbally express their attitudes, so the challenge is to explain and measure its impact. This research aims to help in this regard by suggesting a theoretical model to understand how message framing is processed from a consumer neuroscience perspective. More precisely, the factors that constitute message framing are systematized and built on a reflective-impulsive model and a neural emotion-cognition framework interpreted to explain the persuasive effects of message framing.

Method: A functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment is used to examine the effects of message framing for four different frame types that are hypothesized to affect consumer information processing differently.

Result: The results suggest that communication strategies should take into account the valence of the objects and the frame used. The behavioral results partially confirm the assumption that two types of information processing could take place, as suggested by the reflective-impulsive model. At the neural level, using the network perspective, the results show that certain brain regions primarily associated with emotional and cognitive interaction processes are active during processing, depending on the framing of the message.

Discussion: In cases of indirect avoidance value-consistent framing, it may be good to communicate the bad in the appropriate frame to influence information processing.

Citing Articles

Message framing materials applied to healthy eating decision-making for pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus: An exploratory study.

Han X, Xu N, Chen S, Zhang J, Gu P PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0319416.

PMID: 39992909 PMC: 11849819. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319416.

References

Ivanoff J, Branning P, Marois R . fMRI evidence for a dual process account of the speed-accuracy tradeoff in decision-making. PLoS One. 2008; 3(7):e2635. PMC: 2440815. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002635. View

LEVIN , Schneider , Gaeth . All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998; 76(2):149-188. DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2804. View

Botvinick M, Cohen J . The computational and neural basis of cognitive control: charted territory and new frontiers. Cogn Sci. 2014; 38(6):1249-85. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12126. View

Pardo J, Lee J, Sheikh S, Surerus-Johnson C, Shah H, Munch K . Where the brain grows old: decline in anterior cingulate and medial prefrontal function with normal aging. Neuroimage. 2007; 35(3):1231-7. PMC: 1913629. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.12.044. View

Lang P . The emotion probe. Studies of motivation and attention. Am Psychol. 1995; 50(5):372-85. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.50.5.372. View

Deppe M, Schwindt W, Pieper A, Kugel H, Plassmann H, Kenning P . Anterior cingulate reflects susceptibility to framing during attractiveness evaluation. Neuroreport. 2007; 18(11):1119-23. DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282202c61. View

Schneider F, Tarawali S . Sustainable Development Goals and livestock systems. Rev Sci Tech. 2021; 40(2):585-595. DOI: 10.20506/rst.40.2.3247. View

Craig A . How do you feel--now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008; 10(1):59-70. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2555. View

Bailey L, McMillan L, Newman A . A sinister subject: Quantifying handedness-based recruitment biases in current neuroimaging research. Eur J Neurosci. 2019; 51(7):1642-1656. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.14542. View

10.

Ismael D, Ploeger A . Consumers' Emotion Attitudes towards Organic and Conventional Food: A Comparison Study of Emotional Profiling and Self-Reported Method. Foods. 2020; 9(1). PMC: 7023274. DOI: 10.3390/foods9010079. View

11.

Tversky A, Kahneman D . The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1981; 211(4481):453-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.7455683. View

12.

Schutz A, Kurz K, Busch G . Virtual farm tours-Virtual reality glasses and tablets are suitable tools to provide insights into pig husbandry. PLoS One. 2022; 17(1):e0261248. PMC: 8746731. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261248. View

13.

Bieg M, Goetz T, Lipnevich A . What students think they feel differs from what they really feel--academic self-concept moderates the discrepancy between students' trait and state emotional self-reports. PLoS One. 2014; 9(3):e92563. PMC: 3960260. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092563. View

14.

Young M, Scannell J, Burns G, Blakemore C . Analysis of connectivity: neural systems in the cerebral cortex. Rev Neurosci. 1994; 5(3):227-50. DOI: 10.1515/revneuro.1994.5.3.227. View

15.

Pessoa L . Beyond brain regions: network perspective of cognition-emotion interactions. Behav Brain Sci. 2012; 35(3):158-9. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X11001567. View

16.

Pessoa L . Emergent processes in cognitive-emotional interactions. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2011; 12(4):433-48. PMC: 3117594. View

17.

Poldrack R . Inferring mental states from neuroimaging data: from reverse inference to large-scale decoding. Neuron. 2011; 72(5):692-7. PMC: 3240863. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.11.001. View

18.

Blanca M, Alarcon R, Arnau J, Bono R, Bendayan R . Non-normal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option?. Psicothema. 2017; 29(4):552-557. DOI: 10.7334/psicothema2016.383. View

19.

Mazurek M, Roitman J, Ditterich J, Shadlen M . A role for neural integrators in perceptual decision making. Cereb Cortex. 2003; 13(11):1257-69. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhg097. View

20.

Wagner A, Shannon B, Kahn I, Buckner R . Parietal lobe contributions to episodic memory retrieval. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005; 9(9):445-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.07.001. View