» Articles » PMID: 16214740

DNA Barcodes for Biosecurity: Invasive Species Identification

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2005 Oct 11
PMID 16214740
Citations 119
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Biosecurity encompasses protecting against any risk through 'biological harm', not least being the economic impact from the spread of pest insects. Molecular diagnostic tools provide valuable support for the rapid and accurate identification of morphologically indistinct alien species. However, these tools currently lack standardization. They are not conducive to adaptation by multiple sectors or countries, or to coping with changing pest priorities. The data presented here identifies DNA barcodes as a very promising opportunity to address this. DNA of tussock moth and fruit fly specimens intercepted at the New Zealand border over the last decade were reanalysed using the cox1 sequence barcode approach. Species identifications were compared with the historical dataset obtained by PCR-RFLP of nuclear rDNA. There was 90 and 96% agreement between the methods for these species, respectively. Improvements included previous tussock moth 'unknowns' being placed to family, genera or species and further resolution within fruit fly species complexes. The analyses highlight several advantages of DNA barcodes, especially their adaptability and predictive value. This approach is a realistic platform on which to build a much more flexible system, with the potential to be adopted globally for the rapid and accurate identification of invasive alien species.

Citing Articles

Phylogeny and divergence time estimation of the subfamily Amphipsyllinae based on the mitogenome.

Pu J, Lin X, Dong W Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1494204.

PMID: 39723187 PMC: 11668791. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1494204.


Mitochondrial genetic diversity of pest and vector species, Frankliniella schultzei (Thripidae: Thripinae).

Singha D, Patidar A, Pal S, Tyagi K, Kumar V Mol Biol Rep. 2024; 52(1):55.

PMID: 39688736 DOI: 10.1007/s11033-024-10108-4.


Integrating DNA Barcoding Within an Orthogonal Approach for Herbal Product Authentication: A Narrative Review.

Nazar N, Saxena A, Sebastian A, Slater A, Sundaresan V, Sgamma T Phytochem Anal. 2024; 36(1):7-29.

PMID: 39532481 PMC: 11743069. DOI: 10.1002/pca.3466.


New Insight into Nucleotide Changes on Irradiated (Hendel), A Pest of Horticultural Importance.

Yusof S, Othman N, Dzomir A, Mohammed M, Aman-Zuki A, Yaakop S Trop Life Sci Res. 2024; 35(2):289-307.

PMID: 39234473 PMC: 11371409. DOI: 10.21315/tlsr2024.35.2.14.


DNA barcoding is currently unreliable for species identification in most crayfishes.

Allison Jr P, Pickich E, Barnett Z, Garrick R Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(7):e70050.

PMID: 39041008 PMC: 11260883. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70050.


References
1.
Hebert P, Ratnasingham S, deWaard J . Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proc Biol Sci. 2003; 270 Suppl 1:S96-9. PMC: 1698023. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0025. View

2.
Miles S . A biochemical key to adult members of the Anopheles gambiae group of species (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol. 1979; 15(3):297-9. DOI: 10.1093/jmedent/15.3.297. View

3.
Martin R, James D, Levesque C . Impacts of Molecular Diagnostic Technologies on Plant Disease Management. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2001; 38:207-239. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.38.1.207. View

4.
Hebert P, Cywinska A, Ball S, deWaard J . Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Biol Sci. 2003; 270(1512):313-21. PMC: 1691236. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2218. View

5.
Kumar P, Fenton B, Jones A . Identification of cecidophyopsis mites (Acari: Eriophyidae) based on variable simple sequence repeats of ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer-1 sequences via multiplex PCR. Insect Mol Biol. 1999; 8(3):347-57. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2583.1999.83123.x. View