» Articles » PMID: 16182644

Sociodemographic, Knowledge, and Attitudinal Factors Related to Meat Consumption in the United States

Overview
Journal J Am Diet Assoc
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2005 Sep 27
PMID 16182644
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To provide information about meat consumption and factors that explain differences among subpopulations, and to evaluate how knowledge and attitudes about nutrition and awareness of diet and health influence meat consumption.

Design: The 1994-1996 Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals provided two nonconsecutive 24-hour recalls. The Diet and Health Knowledge Survey was administered at least 1 week after the last 24-hour recall. Meat subgroups (chicken, beef, pork, and processed pork products) were calculated from Food Guide Pyramid meat groups by using recipe ingredients.

Subjects: The study sample included 4,802 children and 9,460 adults from the Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals and 5,649 adults from the Diet and Health Knowledge Survey.

Statistics: Weighted percentages and means described the food intake and self-assessed dietary characteristics. Relationships among types of meat intake, dietary characteristics, and demographics were evaluated using a two-stage, multivariate regression model.

Results: Individuals in higher income households consumed relatively more chicken; those in low-income households consumed more processed pork products. Those consuming no beef and smaller amounts of chicken had the lowest discretionary fat intakes. Beef and pork consumers were more likely to think that their diets were too high in fat, but less likely to believe it is important to eat a low-fat diet. Region of residence affected the probability of consuming most meats. Having a high level of education was associated with a lower likelihood of consuming beef and pork.

Conclusions: Sociodemographic factors are strong predictors of the probability of choosing particular types of meat and of the amounts eaten. Knowledge and attitudes about diet and meat products also influence choices.

Citing Articles

Evolving Appetites: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives in Terms of Meat Substitutes in Europe.

Mustapa M, Baba Y, Baishakhy S, Kallas Z Food Sci Nutr. 2025; 13(1):e4753.

PMID: 39803275 PMC: 11725167. DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.4753.


A dataset on consumers' knowledge, attitude, and practice: Investigating electric two-wheeler vehicle adoption in the Indian automobile sector.

Singh R, Gupta N, Yadav G, Kushwaha R, Mishra M Data Brief. 2024; 55:110605.

PMID: 39006343 PMC: 11239450. DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2024.110605.


Pork Meat Composition and Health: A Review of the Evidence.

Vicente F, Pereira P Foods. 2024; 13(12).

PMID: 38928846 PMC: 11202857. DOI: 10.3390/foods13121905.


Predictors of Eating Less Meat and More Plant-Based Food in the Polish Sample.

Jezewska-Zychowicz M, Sajdakowska M, Gebski J, Kosicka-Gebska M, Gutkowska K Nutrients. 2024; 16(11).

PMID: 38892579 PMC: 11174385. DOI: 10.3390/nu16111646.


Why don't politicians talk about meat? The political psychology of human-animal relations in elections.

Saha S Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1021013.

PMID: 37425167 PMC: 10327565. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1021013.