Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging of Coronary Arteries. Is Three Layers the Norm?
Overview
Affiliations
Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the significance of the three-layered appearance of coronary arteries in adolescence and adults from intravascular ultrasound scans and to correlate these observations with histopathology.
Methods And Results: Sixteen intact hearts were excised at autopsy from patients with no clinical history of coronary artery disease. The patients' ages ranged from 13 to 55 years. A 30-MHz ultrasound imaging catheter was used to obtain images throughout the epicardial coronary vasculature. A total of 72 image cross sections was marked by epivascular sutures, and the corresponding histological sections were examined. Ultrasound images were classified into two groups: images exhibiting three-layered appearance and images without distinct layering. Histological analysis revealed a significantly greater degree of intimal thickening in segments with three layers (243 +/- 105 microns) than in nonlayered segments (112 +/- 55 microns). Discriminant analysis of these data predicted the threshold between the two groups to be 178 microns. Measurements of medial thickness were not different between these two groups (235 +/- 61 versus 210 +/- 76 microns). In the nonlayered group, the average patient age was 27.1 +/- 8.5 years, whereas in the three-layered groups, the average age was 42.8 +/- 9.8 years.
Conclusions: The intracoronary ultrasound image appearance of young, morphologically normal coronary artery walls is homogeneous without layering. A three-layered appearance suggests the presence of at least 178 microns of intimal thickening and is seen more frequently with advancing age.
Karim K, Akbar M, Pramudyo M, Martha J Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 25(1):32.
PMID: 39077662 PMC: 11262383. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2501032.
Zumbardo-Bacelis G, Peponi L, Vargas-Coronado R, Rodriguez-Velazquez E, Alatorre-Meda M, Chevallier P Polymers (Basel). 2024; 16(10).
PMID: 38794507 PMC: 11125268. DOI: 10.3390/polym16101314.
Rathod K, Hamshere S, Jones D, Mathur A Interv Cardiol. 2018; 10(1):8-15.
PMID: 29588667 PMC: 5808463. DOI: 10.15420/icr.2015.10.1.8.
Komiyama H, Takano H, Nakamura S, Takano M, Hata N, Yasushi M Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2016; 14(1):47.
PMID: 27876049 PMC: 5120430. DOI: 10.1186/s12947-016-0090-3.
Intravascular photoacoustic imaging at 35 and 80 MHz.
Li X, Wei W, Zhou Q, Shung K, Chen Z J Biomed Opt. 2012; 17(10):106005.
PMID: 23224004 PMC: 3461096. DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.17.10.106005.