» Articles » PMID: 16172772

Anaphylaxis in Adults Referred to a Clinical Immunology/allergy Centre in Singapore

Overview
Journal Singapore Med J
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2005 Sep 21
PMID 16172772
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: To study the clinical features and causes of anaphylaxis in consecutive adult patients referred to a clinical immunology/allergy centre in Singapore.

Methods: A retrospective review of 67 consecutive adults with anaphylaxis who presented from July 1, 1998 to February 28, 2002 was performed. Anaphylaxis was defined as a severe life-threatening systemic IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reaction. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced idiosyncratic reactions and other non-IgE mediated reactions were excluded. Hypotension and bronchospasm were not required to make a diagnosis. The aetiology was determined from clinical history followed by measurement of allergen-specific IgE levels, skin prick test with commercially-available allergen extracts or prick-prick test with the fresh/cooked/canned food products.

Results: The mean age of patients was 32.9 +/- 10.9 (range 19-57) years. There were 44 (65.7 percent) males and 23 (34.3 percent) females. The main causes were food (44.8 percent), insect stings (32.8 percent) and idiopathic (22.4 percent). There were no cases due to drugs or natural rubber latex. Seafood (crustaceans and molluscs) comprised 66.7 percent of food-induced anaphylaxis. Honeybee and wasp stings together comprised 45 percent of insect venom anaphylaxis. The most common manifestations were dyspnoea (59.7 percent), urticaria (58.2 percent), angioedema (44.8 percent), and syncope (43.3 percent). Hypotension was documented in only 28.4 percent of cases.

Conclusion: Food (crustaceans and molluscs) was the most common cause followed by insect stings or bites. The inability to identify the causative insect in 50 percent of cases with insect venom anaphylaxis limited the role of specific immunotherapy. Compared to other reported series, there were no cases of drug or latex anaphylaxis.

Citing Articles

Genome-Wide Identification and Comparative Analysis of Allergens in .

Ng J, Shin S, Xiao X, Xiong Q, Cao H, Yuan R Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2025; 17(1):94-110.

PMID: 39895605 PMC: 11791374. DOI: 10.4168/aair.2025.17.1.94.


Mast Cells as a Target-A Comprehensive Review of Recent Therapeutic Approaches.

Baran J, Sobiepanek A, Mazurkiewicz-Pisarek A, Rogalska M, Gryciuk A, Kuryk L Cells. 2023; 12(8).

PMID: 37190096 PMC: 10136699. DOI: 10.3390/cells12081187.


Seafood Allergy in Asia: Geographical Specificity and Beyond.

Wai C, Leung N, Leung A, Wong G, Leung T Front Allergy. 2022; 2:676903.

PMID: 35387013 PMC: 8974776. DOI: 10.3389/falgy.2021.676903.


Diagnosis of venom allergy: use of immunochemical methods and a passive basophil activation test.

Gunasekara P, Handunnetti S, Premawansa S, Kaluarachchi P, Karunatilake C, Ratnayake I Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2019; 15:80.

PMID: 31827544 PMC: 6894289. DOI: 10.1186/s13223-019-0394-6.


A survey of anaphylaxis etiology and treatment.

Ahanchian H, Behmanesh F, Jabbari Azad F, Ansari E, Khoshkhui M, Farid R Med Gas Res. 2019; 8(4):129-134.

PMID: 30713664 PMC: 6352571. DOI: 10.4103/2045-9912.248262.