» Articles » PMID: 25741437

The Development of a Standardised Diet History Tool to Support the Diagnosis of Food Allergy

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2015 Mar 6
PMID 25741437
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The disparity between reported and diagnosed food allergy makes robust diagnosis imperative. The allergy-focussed history is an important starting point, but published literature on its efficacy is sparse. Using a structured approach to connect symptoms, suspected foods and dietary intake, a multi-disciplinary task force of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology developed paediatric and adult diet history tools. Both tools are divided into stages using traffic light labelling (red, amber and green). The red stage requires the practitioner to gather relevant information on symptoms, atopic history, food triggers, foods eaten and nutritional issues. The amber stage facilitates interpretation of the responses to the red-stage questions, thus enabling the practitioner to prepare to move forward. The final green stage provides a summary template and test algorithm to support continuation down the diagnostic pathway. These tools will provide a standardised, practical approach to support food allergy diagnosis, ensuring that all relevant information is captured and interpreted in a robust manner. Future work is required to validate their use in diverse age groups, disease entities and in different countries, in order to account for differences in health care systems, food availability and dietary norms.

Citing Articles

Sensitization to α-gal and omega-5-gliadin in patients with chronic urticaria: clinical implications and need for targeted testing.

Vukicevic Lazarevic V, Bozan M, Lokner I, Ranogajec A Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2024; 41(5):500-504.

PMID: 39606606 PMC: 11589628. DOI: 10.5114/ada.2024.144401.


The evolution of nutritional care in children with food allergies - With a focus on cow's milk allergy.

Meyer R, Groetch M, Santos A, Venter C J Hum Nutr Diet. 2024; 38(1):e13391.

PMID: 39587736 PMC: 11589409. DOI: 10.1111/jhn.13391.


World Allergy Organization (WAO) Diagnosis and Rationale for Action against Cow's Milk Allergy (DRACMA) guidelines update - XVI - Nutritional management of cow's milk allergy.

Venter C, Meyer R, Groetch M, Nowak-Wegrzyn A, Mennini M, Pawankar R World Allergy Organ J. 2024; 17(8):100931.

PMID: 39228431 PMC: 11369454. DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2024.100931.


Comparison of skin prick test and prick-to-prick test with fruits and vegetables in the diagnosis of food allergy.

Terlouw S, van Boven F, Borsboom-van Zonneveld M, de Graaf-In t Veld T, van Wijk R, van Daele P Clin Transl Allergy. 2024; 14(7):e12375.

PMID: 38970153 PMC: 11226404. DOI: 10.1002/clt2.12375.


Food allergy in children-the current status and the way forward.

Elghoudi A, Narchi H World J Clin Pediatr. 2022; 11(3):253-269.

PMID: 35663006 PMC: 9134150. DOI: 10.5409/wjcp.v11.i3.253.


References
1.
Turner P, Ng I, Kemp A, Campbell D . Seafood allergy in children: a descriptive study. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2011; 106(6):494-501. DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2011.02.001. View

2.
Wuthrich B, Schmid A, Walther B, Sieber R . Milk consumption does not lead to mucus production or occurrence of asthma. J Am Coll Nutr. 2005; 24(6 Suppl):547S-55S. DOI: 10.1080/07315724.2005.10719503. View

3.
Patelis A, Gunnbjornsdottir M, Borres M, Burney P, Gislason T, Toren K . Natural history of perceived food hypersensitivity and IgE sensitisation to food allergens in a cohort of adults. PLoS One. 2014; 9(1):e85333. PMC: 3888405. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085333. View

4.
Berns S, Halm E, Sampson H, Sicherer S, Busse P, Wisnivesky J . Food allergy as a risk factor for asthma morbidity in adults. J Asthma. 2007; 44(5):377-81. DOI: 10.1080/02770900701364031. View

5.
Di Lorenzo G, Pacor M, Mansueto P, Martinelli N, Esposito-Pellitteri M, Bianco C . Food-additive-induced urticaria: a survey of 838 patients with recurrent chronic idiopathic urticaria. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2005; 138(3):235-42. DOI: 10.1159/000088724. View