» Articles » PMID: 16144908

Translational Crossroads for Biomarkers

Overview
Journal Clin Cancer Res
Specialty Oncology
Date 2005 Sep 8
PMID 16144908
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A group of investigators met at a Specialized Programs of Research Excellence Workshop to discuss key issues in the translation of biomarker discovery to the development of useful laboratory tests for cancer care. Development and approval of several new markers and technologies have provided informative examples that include more specific markers for prostate cancer, more sensitive tests for ovarian cancer, more objective analysis of tissue architecture and an earlier indication of response to treatment in breast cancer. Although there is no clear paradigm for biomarker development, several principles are clear. Marker development should be driven by clinical needs, including early cancer detection, accurate pretreatment staging, and prediction of response to treatment, as well as monitoring disease progression and response to therapy. Development of a national repository that uses carefully preserved, well-annotated tissue specimens will facilitate new marker development. Reference standards will be an essential component of this process. Both hospital-based and commercial laboratories can play a role in developing biomarkers from discovery to test validation. Partnering of academe and industry should occur throughout the process of biomarker development. The National Cancer Institute is in a unique position to bring together academe, industry, and the Food and Drug Administration to (a) define clinical needs for biomarkers by tumor type, (b) establish analytic and clinical paradigms for biomarker development, (c) discuss ways in which markers from different companies might be evaluated in combination, (d) establish computational methods to combine data from multiple biomarkers, (e) share information regarding promising markers developed in National Cancer Institute-supported programs, and (f) exchange data regarding new platforms and techniques that can accelerate marker development.

Citing Articles

FOXP3 serum concentration; a likely predictor of CIN and cervical cancer: Secondary analysis from a case control study at a clinic in South western Uganda.

Ssedyabane F, Niyonzima N, Ngonzi J, Nambi Najjuma J, Mudondo H, Okeny C Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2024; 55:101466.

PMID: 39156036 PMC: 11328032. DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2024.101466.


The Performance and Clinical Applicability of HER2 Digital Image Analysis in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Dunenova G, Kalmataeva Z, Kaidarova D, Dauletbaev N, Semenova Y, Mansurova M Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(15).

PMID: 39123488 PMC: 11311684. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16152761.


Serum Proteomic Signatures in Cervical Cancer: Current Status and Future Directions.

Weaver C, Nam A, Settle C, Overton M, Giddens M, Richardson K Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(9).

PMID: 38730581 PMC: 11083044. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16091629.


Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer: an insight highlighting pathogenesis and targeting strategies.

Ojha P, Maste M, Tubachi S, Patil V Virusdisease. 2022; 33(2):132-154.

PMID: 35991700 PMC: 9381672. DOI: 10.1007/s13337-022-00768-w.


Maternal circulating concentrations of soluble Fas and Elabela in early- and late-onset preeclampsia.

Para R, Romero R, Gomez-Lopez N, Tarca A, Panaitescu B, Done B J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020; 35(2):316-329.

PMID: 32008387 PMC: 10544759. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1716720.