» Articles » PMID: 16133081

Comparison of Postural Control in Unilateral Stance Between Healthy Controls and Lumbar Discectomy Patients with and Without Pain

Overview
Journal Eur Spine J
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2005 Sep 1
PMID 16133081
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Main Problem: Previous studies have demonstrated that sciatica patients have poorer postural control than healthy controls and that postural control remains unchanged 3 months after lumbar discectomy in sciatica patients. The aims of the current study were to investigate whether static balance control recovers in pain-free discectomy patients long-term after lumbar discectomy. Next is to determine whether static balance responses of asymptomatic and symptomatic lumbar discectomy patients differed from each other and from healthy controls. In addition, the influence of the extent of disc resection (unilateral/bilateral removal) and the side of operation on static balance control were investigated.

Methods: Fifteen pain-free lumbar discectomy patients, 23 lumbar discectomy patients with residual pain and 72 controls performed unilateral stance tasks with eyes open and eyes closed on a force plate were taken up for the investigation. Three repetitions of a 10 s unilateral stance test were performed on each leg. Postural sway was determined. Patients were divided into three age groups.

Results: In the eyes open condition, there was no significant difference between postural sway of pain-free lumbar discectomy patients and controls (P=0.68), whereas balance of patients with pain was significantly worse than in controls (P=0.003). In the eyes closed condition, the sway in both groups of lumbar discectomy patients was significantly worse than in controls (pain-free P=0.009/painful P<0.001). No significant differences were found in postural sway between patients with unilateral and bilateral disc resection. In unilateral stance on the leg of the operated side, centre of gravity sway was not significantly different in the eyes open condition compared to the eyes closed condition, whereas in stance on the leg of the non-operated side, postural sway was significantly lower in the eyes open condition compared to the eyes closed condition. In both conditions, postural sway in the age group of 50-65 years was significantly higher than in the age groups of 30-39 years (eyes open P=0.005; eyes closed P<0.001) and 40-49 years (eyes open P=0.002; eyes closed P=0.006). There was no significant difference between the age group of 30-39 years and the age group of 40-49 years (P=0.51).

Conclusion: As for long-term following lumbar discectomy, there is no complete recovery of postural control. Patients seem to develop visual compensation mechanisms for underlying sensory-motor deficits, which are, however, sufficient in case of pain relief only. Further study is needed to determine the cause of the balance disturbances in lumbar discectomy patients.

Citing Articles

A framework of biomarkers for skeletal aging: a consensus statement by the Aging Biomarker Consortium.

Suo J, Gan Y, Xie Y, Xu S, Wang J, Chen D Life Med. 2025; 2(6):lnad045.

PMID: 39872060 PMC: 11748998. DOI: 10.1093/lifemedi/lnad045.


Effect of Whole-Body Vibration on Balance or Proprioception in Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review.

Tariq N, Khan Z, Veqar Z J Chiropr Med. 2024; 22(4):284-293.

PMID: 38205229 PMC: 10774621. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2023.04.006.


Effect of spinal manipulation on sensorimotor functions in back pain patients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Wilder D, Vining R, Pohlman K, Meeker W, Xia T, DeVocht J Trials. 2011; 12:161.

PMID: 21708042 PMC: 3148990. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-161.


Computed tomographic analysis of the quality of trunk muscles in asymptomatic and symptomatic lumbar discectomy patients.

Bouche K, Vanovermeire O, Stevens V, Coorevits P, Caemaert J, Cambier D BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011; 12:65.

PMID: 21453531 PMC: 3079706. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-65.


Postural control in patients with lumbar disc herniation in the early postoperative period.

Sipko T, Chantsoulis M, Kuczynski M Eur Spine J. 2009; 19(3):409-14.

PMID: 19562385 PMC: 2899757. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1082-x.

References
1.
Mientjes M, Frank J . Balance in chronic low back pain patients compared to healthy people under various conditions in upright standing. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 1999; 14(10):710-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(99)00025-x. View

2.
Loupasis G, Stamos K, Katonis P, Sapkas G, Korres D, Hartofilakidis G . Seven- to 20-year outcome of lumbar discectomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999; 24(22):2313-7. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199911150-00005. View

3.
Atlas S, Chang Y, Kammann E, KELLER R, Deyo R, Singer D . Long-term disability and return to work among patients who have a herniated lumbar disc: the effect of disability compensation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82(1):4-15. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200001000-00002. View

4.
Radebold A, Cholewicki J, Panjabi M, Patel T . Muscle response pattern to sudden trunk loading in healthy individuals and in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(8):947-54. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200004150-00009. View

5.
Yorimitsu E, Chiba K, Toyama Y, Hirabayashi K . Long-term outcomes of standard discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a follow-up study of more than 10 years. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26(6):652-7. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200103150-00019. View