» Articles » PMID: 16112835

The Effects of Solvents on Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation

Overview
Specialty Toxicology
Date 2005 Aug 23
PMID 16112835
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and ethanol are common organic solvents used for dissolving lipophilic substances for in vitro testing. However, DMSO is known to induce differentiation in embryonic stem (ES) and embryonic teratocarcinoma (EC) cells. In order to clarify if solvents like DMSO and ethanol have an influence on in vitro developmental toxicity test systems, the presented study has evaluated their effects on differentiation by using different test systems. ES and EC cells were transfected with a construct containing the mTert promoter combined with the green fluorescent protein gene (GFP). A down-regulation of mTert, a marker for undifferentiated cells, results in a lower expression of GFP, which could be measured by flow cytometry. Taking the specific characteristics of ES and EC cells into account this effect could be a hint for the interaction of DMSO with embryonic development. Additionally, the effects of the solvents ethanol and DMSO on Oct-4 expression, another marker for undifferentiated cells, were measured in wild-type ES cells. Both selected molecular markers demonstrated an induction of differentiation after exposure to DMSO; in wild-type ES cells at a concentration of 0.125% and in transgenic EC cells at a concentration of 0.25% DMSO. All other differences from controls, including those which attained a level of statistical significance, were minor or not dosage related in degree, or were not consistent over time and are, therefore, considered to be of little toxicological importance. In addition, a cytotoxicity test demonstrated that the solvents affected the employed molecular markers in non-cytotoxic concentrations. The ES cells were the most sensitive towards the cytotoxic effects of the solvent DMSO while the EC cells were more sensitive when treated with the solvent ethanol.

Citing Articles

Time-efficient strategies in human iPS cell-derived pancreatic progenitor differentiation and cryopreservation: advancing towards practical applications.

Genova E, Rispoli P, Fengming Y, Kohei J, Bramuzzo M, Bulla R Stem Cell Res Ther. 2024; 15(1):483.

PMID: 39695795 PMC: 11658428. DOI: 10.1186/s13287-024-04068-6.


A low dose of curcumin-PDA nanoparticles improves viability and proliferation in endoneurial fibroblasts and Schwann cell cultures.

Vazquez Alberdi L, Martinez-Busi M, Arrarte E, Echeverry C, Calero M, Kun A Discov Nano. 2024; 19(1):81.

PMID: 38714630 PMC: 11076434. DOI: 10.1186/s11671-024-04023-7.


Accessible luminal interface of bovine rectal organoids generated from cryopreserved biopsy tissues.

Kawasaki M, Ambrosini Y PLoS One. 2024; 19(3):e0301079.

PMID: 38512940 PMC: 10956885. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301079.


Impact of cryopreservation on viability, gene expression and function of enteric nervous system derived neurospheres.

Heumuller-Klug S, Maurer K, Tapia-Laliena M, Sticht C, Christmann A, Morz H Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023; 11:1196472.

PMID: 37377739 PMC: 10291272. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1196472.


Chemical approaches to cryopreservation.

Murray K, Gibson M Nat Rev Chem. 2023; 6(8):579-593.

PMID: 37118007 DOI: 10.1038/s41570-022-00407-4.