» Articles » PMID: 16030315

Multiple Reaction Monitoring As a Method for Identifying Protein Posttranslational Modifications

Overview
Journal J Biomol Tech
Date 2005 Jul 21
PMID 16030315
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The activity of many transcriptional regulators is significantly altered by posttranslational modifications of specific sites. For example, the activity of the muscle-restricted transcription factor family myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2) is tightly controlled by phosphorylation. This modification is responsible for either an increase or a decrease in transcriptional activity, depending on the specific amino acid residues that are phosphorylated by signal-dependent kinases. Although mass spectrometry-based methods, such as precursor ion and neutral loss scans, are extremely useful for identifying unknown phosphopeptides from a complex mixture, they do not take advantage of any prior knowledge about the protein being investigated. Quite often a significant amount of information is available. This may include the primary sequence, type of phosphorylation (serine/threonine vs. tyrosine), or predicted phosphoacceptor sites (consensus peptide that is targeted by a kinase). This information can be used to predict precursor and fragment ion m/z values for a multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) experiment. By using these highly sensitive MRM experiments to trigger dependent product ion scans on a hybrid quadrupole linear ion-trap instrument, we were able to identify low levels of phosphorylation of MEF2A (a member of the MEF2 family), and alpha-casein. This method of monitoring protein phosphorylation at specific phosphoacceptor sites may prove useful in understanding the physiological regulation of protein function.

Citing Articles

The use of technology in the subcategorisation of osteoarthritis: a Delphi study approach.

Mennan C, Hopkins T, Channon A, Elliott M, Johnstone B, Kadir T Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2022; 2(3):100081.

PMID: 36474678 PMC: 9718088. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2020.100081.


Development of multiple reaction monitoring assay for quantification of carnosine in human plasma.

Pandya V, Sonwane B, Rathore R, Unnikrishnan A, Kumaran S, Kulkarni M RSC Adv. 2022; 10(2):763-769.

PMID: 35494477 PMC: 9047520. DOI: 10.1039/c9ra08532g.


Effects of various artificial agarwood-induction techniques on the metabolome of Aquilaria sinensis.

Zhang N, Xue S, Song J, Zhou X, Zhou D, Liu X BMC Plant Biol. 2021; 21(1):591.

PMID: 34903180 PMC: 8667428. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-021-03378-8.


Extensive Metabolite Profiling in the Unexploited Organs of Black Tiger for Their Potential Valorization in the Pharmaceutical Industry.

Gao J, Xiong K, Zhou W, Li W Life (Basel). 2021; 11(6).

PMID: 34200589 PMC: 8229443. DOI: 10.3390/life11060544.


Application of Proteomics Technologies in Oil Palm Research.

Lau B, Othman A, Ramli U Protein J. 2018; 37(6):473-499.

PMID: 30367348 DOI: 10.1007/s10930-018-9802-x.


References
1.
Naya F, Olson E . MEF2: a transcriptional target for signaling pathways controlling skeletal muscle growth and differentiation. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1999; 11(6):683-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0955-0674(99)00036-8. View

2.
Mann M, Ong S, Gronborg M, Steen H, Jensen O, Pandey A . Analysis of protein phosphorylation using mass spectrometry: deciphering the phosphoproteome. Trends Biotechnol. 2002; 20(6):261-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-7799(02)01944-3. View

3.
Shou W, Verma R, Annan R, Huddleston M, Chen S, Carr S . Mapping phosphorylation sites in proteins by mass spectrometry. Methods Enzymol. 2002; 351:279-96. DOI: 10.1016/s0076-6879(02)51853-x. View

4.
Cox D, Du M, Guo X, Siu K, McDermott J . Tandem affinity purification of protein complexes from mammalian cells. Biotechniques. 2002; 33(2):267-8, 270. DOI: 10.2144/02332bm02. View

5.
Cox D, Du M, Marback M, Yang E, Chan J, Siu K . Phosphorylation motifs regulating the stability and function of myocyte enhancer factor 2A. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278(17):15297-303. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M211312200. View