» Articles » PMID: 16021464

Hearing Loss Among Operating Engineers in American Construction Industry

Overview
Date 2005 Jul 16
PMID 16021464
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Occupational noise exposure and noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) among construction workers has long been recognized as a problem in the United States, yet little is known about the prevalence of NIHL among American construction workers. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and characteristics of hearing loss among operating engineers (OEs) who operate heavy construction machinery.

Method: As a part of hearing protection intervention, an audiometric test was conducted for both ears at frequencies 0.5 through 8 kHz in the soundproof booth. Prior to the audiometric test, a paper-pencil pre-hearing test questionnaire was administered and an otoscopic examination was completed. Prevalence of hearing loss was determined based on hearing threshold levels (HTLs) in the worst ear with a low fence of 25 dB.

Result: A total of 623 workers were included in the analysis and they were predominantly middle-aged Caucasian males (mean age = 43 years, Caucasian = 90%, male = 92%). Over 60% of OEs showed hearing loss in the noise-sensitive higher frequencies of 4 and 6 kHz. The rate of hearing loss was particularly higher among workers who reported longer years of working in the construction industry. Workers showed significantly poorer hearing in the left ear, and a typical characteristic of NIHL, a V-notch at 4 or 6 kHz, was not shown in this population. Thirty-eight percent reported ringing/buzzing in the ear and 62% indicated having problems in understanding what people say in loud noise. Average reported use of hearing protection devices (HPDs) was 48% of the time they were required to be used. Significant inverse relationship was found between higher frequency (4-6 kHz) hearing loss and use of HPDs (r =-0.134, p < 0.001). Workers using HPDs more had significantly better hearing than those who did not.

Conclusion: The study demonstrated a significant NIHL problem and low use of HPDs in OEs. An effective hearing conservation program, including a periodic audiometric testing and hearing protection intervention, for this study population should be in place.

Citing Articles

The Global Prevalence of Noise Induced Hearing Impairment Among Industrial Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Salari N, Hosseinian-Far A, Zarei H, Rasoulpoor S, Ghasemi H, Elyasi H Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024; 76(6):5035-5049.

PMID: 39559031 PMC: 11569344. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-024-05032-9.


Using mobile audiometry (Wulira App) to assess noise induced hearing loss among industrial workers in Kampala, Uganda: A cross-sectional study.

Batte C, Atukunda I, Semulimi A, Nakabuye M, Bwambale F, Mumbere J PLoS One. 2023; 18(1):e0279407.

PMID: 36608035 PMC: 9821776. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279407.


The audiogram: Detection of pure-tone stimuli in ototoxicity monitoring and assessments of investigational medicines for the inner ear.

Le Prell C, Brewer C, Campbell K J Acoust Soc Am. 2022; 152(1):470.

PMID: 35931504 PMC: 9288270. DOI: 10.1121/10.0011739.


Awareness and usage of personal protective equipment among construction workers and their hearing assessment by pure tone audiometry; A cross-sectional study in South India.

Hameed S, Chethana K, Sunu Z, Kiran K J Family Med Prim Care. 2022; 10(11):4072-4076.

PMID: 35136769 PMC: 8797109. DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_858_21.


An assessment of noise exposure and hearing health status among auto body workers in Kermanshah, Iran.

Kakavandi M, Omidi A, Hashemian A, Jabari M, Hamidi A, Bavandpur E J Educ Health Promot. 2021; 10:290.

PMID: 34667790 PMC: 8459840. DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1452_20.


References
1.
Reilly M, Rosenman K, Kalinowski D . Occupational noise-induced hearing loss surveillance in Michigan. J Occup Environ Med. 1998; 40(8):667-74. DOI: 10.1097/00043764-199808000-00002. View

2.
Chen J, Tsai J . Hearing loss among workers at an oil refinery in Taiwan. Arch Environ Health. 2003; 58(1):55-8. DOI: 10.3200/AEOH.58.1.55-58. View

3.
Kahan E, Ross E . Knowledge and attitudes of a group of South African mine workers towards noise induced hearing loss and the use of hearing protective devices. S Afr J Commun Disord. 1994; 41:37-47. View

4.
May J . Occupational hearing loss. Am J Ind Med. 1999; 37(1):112-20. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(200001)37:1<112::aid-ajim9>3.0.co;2-#. View

5.
Dobie R . Prevention of noise-induced hearing loss. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995; 121(4):385-91. DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1995.01890040011002. View