» Articles » PMID: 1597610

Comparison of the Acoustic Properties of Six Popular Stethoscopes

Overview
Journal J Acoust Soc Am
Date 1992 Apr 1
PMID 1597610
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study evaluated stethoscope acoustics by using a sound frequency generator and an active artificial ear. Six popular, currently available stethoscopes were compared in their various modes involving bells, diaphragms, etc.: Littmann Classic II, Littmann Cardiology II, Littmann Master Cardiology, Hewlett-Packard Rappaport-Sprague, Tycos Harvey Triple Head, and Allen Medical Series 5A RPS Binaural. The transfer function was measured from 37.5-1000 Hz, the range where nearly all heart and lung sounds are found. Sound in the low-frequency range (37.5-112.5 Hz) was in most cases amplified by the bells and attenuated by the diaphragms; however, there were no significant differences. Both bells and diaphragms attenuated sound transmission in the high range, and this increased with frequency. The Tycos Harvey Triple Head ribbed diaphragm attenuated sound transmission to a significantly greater extent than the other diaphragms (P less than 0.01). The results show that the bell and diaphragm for a given stethoscope usually have different transmission characteristics, particularly at low frequencies. The Littmann Classic II is an exception. The Hewlett-Packard and Tycos Harvey stethoscopes showed the greatest differences in low frequency response between the bell and the diaphragm. While the differences found in sound transmission between stethoscopes were in most cases small, the Littmann Cardiology II, bell and diaphragm, appears to possess the best overall performance by this study design.

Citing Articles

Validation of 3D printed MAYO tubes and stethoscope in simulated medical environment - Tools fabricated with additive manufacturing for emergency care.

Molnar F, Rendeki M, Rendeki S, Nagy B, Bacher V, Bogar P Heliyon. 2023; 9(10):e20866.

PMID: 37916113 PMC: 10616327. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20866.


Review on the Advancements of Stethoscope Types in Chest Auscultation.

Seah J, Zhao J, Wang D, Lee H Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(9).

PMID: 37174938 PMC: 10177339. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13091545.


Optimized Acoustic Phantom Design for Characterizing Body Sound Sensors.

Rennoll V, McLane I, Elhilali M, West J Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(23).

PMID: 36501787 PMC: 9735779. DOI: 10.3390/s22239086.


The Intelligibility of the Reversed-Stethoscope Technique in Age-Related Hearing Loss.

Koerber R, Vaccarello L, Ho A Can Geriatr J. 2022; 25(2):127-133.

PMID: 35747410 PMC: 9156421. DOI: 10.5770/cgj.25.527.


Electronic Stethoscope Filtering Mimics the Perceived Sound Characteristics of Acoustic Stethoscope.

Rennoll V, McLane I, Emmanouilidou D, West J, Elhilali M IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2020; 25(5):1542-1549.

PMID: 32870803 PMC: 7917155. DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2020.3020494.