Should Treatment of (sub)acute Low Back Pain Be Aimed at Psychosocial Prognostic Factors? Cluster Randomised Clinical Trial in General Practice

Overview

Journal BMJ

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2005 Jun 22

PMID 15967762

Citations 44

Authors

Petra Jellema

Danielle A W M van der Windt

Henriette E van der Horst

Jos W R Twisk

Wim A B Stalman

Lex M Bouter

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effects of a minimal intervention strategy aimed at assessment and modification of psychosocial prognostic factors and usual care for treatment of (sub)acute low back pain in general practice.

Design: Cluster randomised clinical trial.

Setting: 60 general practitioners in 41 general practices.

Participants: 314 patients with non-specific low back pain of less than 12 weeks' duration, recruited by their general practitioner.

Interventions: In the minimal intervention strategy group the general practitioner explored the presence of psychosocial prognostic factors, discussed these factors, set specific goals for reactivation, and provided an educational booklet. The consultation took about 20 minutes. Usual care was not standardised.

Main Outcome Measures: Functional disability (Roland-Morris disability questionnaire), perceived recovery, and sick leave because of low back pain assessed at baseline and after 6, 13, 26, and 52 weeks.

Results: The dropout rate was 8% in the minimal intervention strategy group and 9% in the usual care group. Multilevel analyses showed no significant differences between the groups on any outcome measure during 12 months of follow-up in the whole group or in relevant subgroups (patients with high scores on psychosocial measures at baseline or a history of frequent or prolonged low back pain).

Conclusion: This study provides no evidence that (Dutch) general practitioners should adopt our new treatment strategy aimed at psychosocial prognostic factors in patients with (sub)acute low back pain. Further research should examine why our new strategy was not more effective than usual care.

Citing Articles

Impact of education in patients undergoing physiotherapy for lower back pain: a level I systematic review and meta-analysis.

Migliorini F, Maffulli N, Schafer L, Manocchio N, Bossa M, Foti C Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025; 51(1):113.

PMID: 39969656 PMC: 11839871. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-025-02788-9.

Effectiveness of coordinated care to reduce the risk of prolonged disability among patients suffering from subacute or recurrent acute low back pain in primary care: protocol of the CO.LOMB cluster-randomized, controlled study.

Ramond-Roquin A, Begue C, Vizzini J, Chhor S, Bouchez T, Parot-Schinkel E Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 10:1156482.

PMID: 37409270 PMC: 10318135. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1156482.

Patient education materials for non-specific low back pain and sciatica: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Furlong B, Etchegary H, Aubrey-Bassler K, Swab M, Pike A, Hall A PLoS One. 2022; 17(10):e0274527.

PMID: 36223377 PMC: 9555681. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274527.

Differences and Correlations of Anxiety, Sleep Quality, and Pressure-Pain Threshold between Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain and Asymptomatic People.

Xu C, Fu Z, Wang J, Wu B, Wang X Pain Res Manag. 2022; 2022:8648584.

PMID: 35619991 PMC: 9129994. DOI: 10.1155/2022/8648584.

Using a Motion Sensor to Categorize Nonspecific Low Back Pain Patients: A Machine Learning Approach.

Abdollahi M, Ashouri S, Abedi M, Azadeh-Fard N, Parnianpour M, Khalaf K Sensors (Basel). 2020; 20(12).

PMID: 32604794 PMC: 7348921. DOI: 10.3390/s20123600.

References

Bombardier C, Hayden J, Beaton D . Minimal clinically important difference. Low back pain: outcome measures. J Rheumatol. 2001; 28(2):431-8. View

Burton A, Waddell G, Tillotson K, Summerton N . Information and advice to patients with back pain can have a positive effect. A randomized controlled trial of a novel educational booklet in primary care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 24(23):2484-91. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199912010-00010. View

Lundeberg T, Lund I, Dahlin L, Borg E, Gustafsson C, Sandin L . Reliability and responsiveness of three different pain assessments. J Rehabil Med. 2002; 33(6):279-83. DOI: 10.1080/165019701753236473. View

Pincus T, Burton A, Vogel S, Field A . A systematic review of psychological factors as predictors of chronicity/disability in prospective cohorts of low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27(5):E109-20. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200203010-00017. View

Roberts L, Little P, Chapman J, Cantrell T, Pickering R, Langridge J . The back home trial: general practitioner-supported leaflets may change back pain behavior. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27(17):1821-8. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200209010-00002. View

Cosby R, Howard M, Kaczorowski J, Willan A, Sellors J . Randomizing patients by family practice: sample size estimation, intracluster correlation and data analysis. Fam Pract. 2003; 20(1):77-82. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/20.1.77. View

Picavet H, Schouten J . Musculoskeletal pain in the Netherlands: prevalences, consequences and risk groups, the DMC(3)-study. Pain. 2003; 102(1-2):167-78. DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00372-x. View

Pengel L, Herbert R, Maher C, Refshauge K . Acute low back pain: systematic review of its prognosis. BMJ. 2003; 327(7410):323. PMC: 169642. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.327.7410.323. View

George S, Fritz J, Bialosky J, Donald D . The effect of a fear-avoidance-based physical therapy intervention for patients with acute low back pain: results of a randomized clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28(23):2551-60. DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000096677.84605.A2. View

10.

Roland M, Morris R . A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983; 8(2):141-4. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198303000-00004. View

11.

Rosenstiel A, Keefe F . The use of coping strategies in chronic low back pain patients: relationship to patient characteristics and current adjustment. Pain. 1983; 17(1):33-44. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90125-2. View

12.

Ware Jr J, Sherbourne C . The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992; 30(6):473-83. View

13.

Waddell G, Newton M, Henderson I, Somerville D, Main C . A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability. Pain. 1993; 52(2):157-168. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(93)90127-B. View

14.

Cherkin D, Deyo R, Street J, Hunt M, BARLOW W . Pitfalls of patient education. Limited success of a program for back pain in primary care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996; 21(3):345-55. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199602010-00019. View

15.

van der Horst H, Schellevis F, van Eijk J, Bleijenberg G . Managing patients with irritable bowel syndrome in general practice. How to promote and reinforce self-care activities. Patient Educ Couns. 1999; 35(2):149-56. DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(98)00053-6. View

16.

Beurskens A, de Vet H, Koke A, Lindeman E, Van Der Heijden G, Regtop W . A patient-specific approach for measuring functional status in low back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999; 22(3):144-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0161-4754(99)70127-2. View

17.

Thomas E, Silman A, Croft P, Papageorgiou A, Jayson M, Macfarlane G . Predicting who develops chronic low back pain in primary care: a prospective study. BMJ. 1999; 318(7199):1662-7. PMC: 28145. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.318.7199.1662. View

18.

Van Der Heijden G, Leffers P, Wolters P, Verheijden J, van Mameren H, Houben J . No effect of bipolar interferential electrotherapy and pulsed ultrasound for soft tissue shoulder disorders: a randomised controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 1999; 58(9):530-40. PMC: 1752938. DOI: 10.1136/ard.58.9.530. View