» Articles » PMID: 29041947

The Fear Reduction Exercised Early (FREE) Approach to Low Back Pain: Study Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial

Overview
Journal Trials
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2017 Oct 19
PMID 29041947
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a major health issue associated with considerable health loss and societal costs. General practitioners (GPs) play an important role in the management of LBP; however, GP care has not been shown to be the most cost-effective approach unless exercise and behavioural counselling are added to usual care. The Fear Reduction Exercised Early (FREE) approach to LBP has been developed to assist GPs to manage LBP by empowering exploration and management of psychosocial barriers to recovery and provision of evidence-based care and information. The aim of the Low Back Pain in General Practice (LBPinGP) trial is to explore whether patients with LBP who receive care from GPs trained in the FREE approach have better outcomes than those who receive usual care.

Methods/design: This is a cluster randomised controlled superiority trial comparing the FREE approach with usual care for LBP management with investigator-blinded assessment of outcomes. GPs will be recruited and then cluster randomised (in practice groups) to the intervention or control arm. Intervention arm GPs will receive training in the FREE approach, and control arm GPs will continue to practice as usual. Patients presenting to their GP with a primary complaint of LBP will be allocated on the basis of allocation of the GP they consult. We aim to recruit 60 GPs and 275 patients (assuming patients are recruited from 75% of GPs and an average of 5 patients per GP complete the study, accounting for 20% patient participant dropout). Patient participants and the trial statistician will be blind to group allocation throughout the study. Analyses will be undertaken on an intention-to-treat basis. The primary outcome will be back-related functional impairment 6 months post-initial LBP consultation (interim data at 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months), measured with the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Secondary patient outcomes include pain, satisfaction, quality of life, days off from work and costs of care. Secondary GP outcomes include beliefs about pain and impairment, GP confidence, and actual and reported clinical behaviour. Health economic and process evaluations will be conducted.

Discussion: In the LBPinGP trial, we will investigate providing an intervention during the first interaction a person with back pain has with their GP. Because the FREE approach is used within a normal GP consultation, if effective, it may be a cost-effective means of improving LBP care.

Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12616000888460 . Registered on 6 July 2016.

Citing Articles

Models of care for managing non-specific low back pain.

Docking S, Sridhar S, Haas R, Mao K, Ramsay H, Buchbinder R Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025; 3:CD015083.

PMID: 40052535 PMC: 11887030. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD015083.pub2.


A Guideline-Implementation Intervention to Improve the Management of Low Back Pain in Primary Care: A Difference-in-Difference-in-Differences Analysis.

Wilson R, Pryymachenko Y, Abbott J, Dean S, Stanley J, Garrett S Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2022; 21(2):253-262.

PMID: 36471226 PMC: 9734860. DOI: 10.1007/s40258-022-00776-3.


Patient education materials for non-specific low back pain and sciatica: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Furlong B, Etchegary H, Aubrey-Bassler K, Swab M, Pike A, Hall A PLoS One. 2022; 17(10):e0274527.

PMID: 36223377 PMC: 9555681. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274527.


The Fear Reduction Exercised Early (FREE) approach to management of low back pain in general practice: A pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial.

Darlow B, Stanley J, Dean S, Abbott J, Garrett S, Wilson R PLoS Med. 2019; 16(9):e1002897.

PMID: 31498799 PMC: 6733445. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002897.


The relationship between the psychological stress of adolescents in school and the prevalence of chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional study in China.

Mei Q, Li C, Yin Y, Wang Q, Wang Q, Deng G Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2019; 13:24.

PMID: 31236133 PMC: 6580587. DOI: 10.1186/s13034-019-0283-2.

References
1.
Vos T, Flaxman A, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M . Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012; 380(9859):2163-96. PMC: 6350784. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61729-2. View

2.
Edwards P, Cooper R, Roberts I, Frost C . Meta-analysis of randomised trials of monetary incentives and response to mailed questionnaires. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005; 59(11):987-99. PMC: 1732953. DOI: 10.1136/jech.2005.034397. View

3.
Kent P, Mirkhil S, Keating J, Buchbinder R, Manniche C, Albert H . The concurrent validity of brief screening questions for anxiety, depression, social isolation, catastrophization, and fear of movement in people with low back pain. Clin J Pain. 2013; 30(6):479-89. DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000010. View

4.
Harris P, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde J . Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2008; 42(2):377-81. PMC: 2700030. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. View

5.
Darlow B, Dean S, Perry M, Mathieson F, Baxter G, Dowell A . Easy to Harm, Hard to Heal: Patient Views About the Back. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015; 40(11):842-50. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000901. View