» Articles » PMID: 15961421

Impedance Control and Internal Model Use During the Initial Stage of Adaptation to Novel Dynamics in Humans

Overview
Journal J Physiol
Specialty Physiology
Date 2005 Jun 18
PMID 15961421
Citations 76
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study investigated the neuromuscular mechanisms underlying the initial stage of adaptation to novel dynamics. A destabilizing velocity-dependent force field (VF) was introduced for sets of three consecutive trials. Between sets a random number of 4-8 null field trials were interposed, where the VF was inactivated. This prevented subjects from learning the novel dynamics, making it possible to repeatedly recreate the initial adaptive response. We were able to investigate detailed changes in neural control between the first, second and third VF trials. We identified two feedforward control mechanisms, which were initiated on the second VF trial and resulted in a 50% reduction in the hand path error. Responses to disturbances encountered on the first VF trial were feedback in nature, i.e. reflexes and voluntary correction of errors. However, on the second VF trial, muscle activation patterns were modified in anticipation of the effects of the force field. Feedforward cocontraction of all muscles was used to increase the viscoelastic impedance of the arm. While stiffening the arm, subjects also exerted a lateral force to counteract the perturbing effect of the force field. These anticipatory actions indicate that the central nervous system responds rapidly to counteract hitherto unfamiliar disturbances by a combination of increased viscoelastic impedance and formation of a crude internal dynamics model.

Citing Articles

Error prediction determines the coordinate system used for the representation of novel dynamics.

Leib R, Franklin D Elife. 2025; 14.

PMID: 40009064 PMC: 11864754. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.84349.


Applied Motor Noise Affects Specific Learning Mechanisms during Short-Term Adaptation to Novel Movement Dynamics.

Foray K, Zhou W, Fitzgerald J, Gianferrara P, Joiner W eNeuro. 2024; 12(1.

PMID: 39592225 PMC: 11747976. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0100-24.2024.


Kernels of Motor Memory Formation: Temporal Generalization in Bimanual Adaptation.

Howard I, Franklin S, Franklin D J Neurosci. 2024; 44(47).

PMID: 39358042 PMC: 11580777. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0359-24.2024.


Differential Impact of Biomechanical Constraints on Control Signal Dimensionality for Gravity Support Versus Propulsion.

Korol A, Gritsenko V bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38405751 PMC: 10888848. DOI: 10.1101/2024.02.12.579990.


Human arm endpoint-impedance in rhythmic human-robot interaction exhibits cyclic variations.

Fortineau V, Siegler I, Makarov M, Rodriguez-Ayerbe P PLoS One. 2023; 18(12):e0295640.

PMID: 38096319 PMC: 10721195. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295640.


References
1.
Krakauer J, Ghilardi M, Ghez C . Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching. Nat Neurosci. 1999; 2(11):1026-31. DOI: 10.1038/14826. View

2.
Franklin D, Burdet E, Osu R, Kawato M, Milner T . Functional significance of stiffness in adaptation of multijoint arm movements to stable and unstable dynamics. Exp Brain Res. 2003; 151(2):145-57. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1443-3. View

3.
Goodbody S, Wolpert D . Temporal and amplitude generalization in motor learning. J Neurophysiol. 1998; 79(4):1825-38. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1998.79.4.1825. View

4.
Franklin D, Osu R, Burdet E, Kawato M, Milner T . Adaptation to stable and unstable dynamics achieved by combined impedance control and inverse dynamics model. J Neurophysiol. 2003; 90(5):3270-82. DOI: 10.1152/jn.01112.2002. View

5.
Gomi H, Kawato M . Human arm stiffness and equilibrium-point trajectory during multi-joint movement. Biol Cybern. 1997; 76(3):163-71. DOI: 10.1007/s004220050329. View